A Nochri who borrowed money with Ribis from a Yisrael and converted; must he repay the Ribis money.
If he turned the Keren and Ribis into one loan before he converted, yes. If he did not, no.
If he turned the Keren and Ribis into one loan before he converted, no. If he did not, yes.
He must always pay the Ribis money.
Machlokes between answers A and B.
Machlokes between answers A and C.
What happens to a Shtar that contains Ribis?
The entire Shtar is invalid.
The Ribis clause is invalid, and the rest of the Shtar remains binding.
The rest of the Shtar remains binding if this is a first offense. If it is a second offense, we invalidate the Shtar to prevent him from lending with Ribis again.
Machlokes between answers A and B.
Machlokes between answers A and C.
Could the one-time Malveh use the invalid Shtar Mechira to retrieve his money from Meshubadim?
No, the “seller” who wrote the Shtar clearly never wanted it to be valid, and only wrote it to take it away from the “buyer.”
Yes, it is like Modeh B’Shtar SheKusvo.
No, it is like a Shtar Mukdam.
Yes, it is like a case of a person who bought a stolen field, that he may recollect his purchase investment from Karka’os.
Yes, it provides Aidus to the fact that money changed hands.
What is the “Shaar”?
The prices posted on the main gate (Shaar) of the town.
The price of the large central market.
The price of the market of medium sized cities.
The initial price when people open their storehouses.
The initial price that boatmen charge when they begin to unload.
Can a regular seller rely on the wholesaler’s Shaar to begin receiving produce on credit?
Yes, a Shaar is a Shaar for everyone.
No, this Shaar is unconnected to him, for buying from the wholesaler is beneath him.
No, this Shaar is unconnected to him, for he knows that he must repay only superior quality produce, which the wholesaler does not have.