(Mishnah): R. Yochanan ben Gudgada testified to the following laws:

If a man was Mekadesh his deaf daughter (when she was a minor or Na'arah), her husband can divorce her;

If an (orphaned) minor Bas Yisrael is married to a Kohen, she may eat Terumah. If she dies, he inherits her;

If a man stole a beam and built it into a building, he may return its value to the owner.

If one was Makdish a stolen animal to be a Korban Chatas, and this was not known to the Rabim, it atones. This is an enactment for the Mizbe'ach.

(Gemara - R. Chaninah, to R. Imi): It seems that a Pikachas (i.e. a female) with Da'as can be divorced with her Da'as or without her Da'as. A Chereshes, who has no Da'as, can be divorced only with Da'as (i.e. she cannot be divorced; Ein Ra'uy l'Bilah, Bilah Me'akeves Bo).

Rebuttal (R. Imi): Was this not testimony?! (The Halachah always follows testimony.) Also this [a Pikachas who went deaf] is similar [to a Chereshes whose father married her off; she can be divorced.]

Question (R. Chaninah): May we add to the testimony?!

R. Chaninah holds that a Pikachas whose father married her off, and she went deaf [she cannot be divorced, for at the time of Kidushin, she had Da'as to receive a Get, and now she does not. The testimony was about one who was a Chereshes when her father married her off.]

R. Yosi holds [that R. Chaninah discusses] a Ketanah [or Na'arah] whose father married her off. (If she were a Bogeres, her father has no Reshus over her. She would marry by herself. - MEICHAL HA'MAYIM)

(R. Yochanan): Why did they say that a minor Bas Yisrael eats Terumah? It is so all Kohanim will be eager to marry her (it is less expensive to feed her), for Chen (she will have grace in their eyes)

(R. Shamai): This is if she knows to guard Kidushin [money].

(R. Chananyah): Since R. Yochanan said that it is for Chen, this [reason] shows that even if she does not know to guard her Kidushin!

Support (R. Ami - Mishnah Nidah 5:4): [A Ketanah at least three years old and one day,] if she married a Kohen, she eats Terumah (even though she is too young to know to guard her Kidushin)!

(Rav Hamnuna citing Rav Asi): A Ketanah [until three years - SHIREI KORBAN] does not have Chupah to permit her to eat Terumah.

Question (R. Aba): If she entered Chupah and did not have Bi'ah, and he sent her to her father's house and she matured, may she eat Terumah?

Answer: We learn from the following. [She eats] based on her first Chupah.

If one stole a beam and built it into a building, Beis Shamai say, he dissembles the entire building and returns it to [the owner]. Beis Hillel say, he returns its value to the owner, due to Takanas ha'Shavin (an enactment to help people repent).

(R. Lazar): What do they argue about? It is when he stole a smoothed beam, but if he stole it and smoothed it (he acquired it through Shinuy, so) he owes money [but keeps it].

If he stole it and (i.e. after he) smoothed it in its place [what is the law]?

Answer: We learn from the following. One who descends to his friend's ruin and built without permission, we estimate for him, and has the lower hand (he receives the lesser of his expenditures and the increased value);

If he requested to take his wood and stones, we do not heed him.

Question (R. Yakov bar Acha citing Rav Nachman bar Yakov): If one unloaded his bundle into his friend's ruin, and went to take it, do we not heed him?!

Answer: Did he not hear what R. Yakov bar Idi said in the name of R. Yehoshua ben Levi - it is [an enactment] due to settlement (of Eretz Yisrael, so there will be places to live).

Assumption (R. Yosi): I thought to say that they argue about both in Eretz Yisrael and in Chutz la'Aretz;

Retraction: From what R. Yakov bar Idi said in the name of R. Yehoshua ben Levi - it is [an enactment] due to settlement, this teaches that they argue about in Eretz Yisrael, but not in Chutz la'Aretz.

Question: If he requested to receive the value of wood and stones, what is the law? (When is the owner of the ruin obligated to pay him?)

Answer #1: We tell him, wait until [the owner of the ruin] lives in it [and then he will pay you].

Answer #2 (Shmuel): We give it to him immediately (his wood and stones, or their value).

(Ula bar Shmuel): (Our Mishnah says that if a stolen Chatas was not known to the Rabim, it atones.) According to letter of the law, even if it was not known to the Rabim, it does not atone. Why did they say that it atones? This is [an enactment] lest the Mizbe'ach be desolate (if Kohanim are dejected because they ate Chulin b'Azarah, they will refrain from offering Korbanos.)

(Reish Lakish): According to letter of the law, even if it was known to the Rabim, it atones. Why did they say that it does not atone? This is [an enactment] lest people say that the Mizbe'ach accepts theft.

Question: What is considered Rabim?

Answer (Guryon citing Reish Lakish): It is three people.

(R. Avin citing R. Yochanan): "Va'Haveisem Gazul Es ha'Pise'ach v'Es ha'Choleh" - just like lame and sick are exposed, also everything exposed (e.g. a known theft is Pasul).