If he gave her Get to her, and said 'it will not be a Get until tomorrow, and he was seized by Kordaikus, R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish argue about this. (Reish Lakish holds that it does not take effect until he is healthy.)

If he threw her Get to her, and said 'it will not be a Get until tomorrow [and she acquired it, but went away and left it there - OHR SOMAYACH Hilchos Gerushin 9:2], R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish argue about this.

Note: Other Meforshim say that also here, he was seized by Kordaikus. I do not understand why separate clauses must teach about one who gave to her and one who threw it to her. Surely they are the same! (PF)

(R. Elazar): R. Avin asked, if one tithed his stack, and said 'it will not be Terumah until tomorrow', and he was seized by Kordaikus, do R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish argue about this?

Question (R. Ze'ira): A Beraisa argues with Reish Lakish, and one cannot resolve [his opinion with] it!

(Beraisa): If one was hanging on a crucifix, or cut up, and he gestured and said 'write a Get to my wife', we write and give in the Chazakah that his Neshamah is in him (he is still alive);

Is it possible that his mind was not befuddled a moment [before death?! Even so, as long as the Get was given before death, it is Kosher!] This argues with Reish Lakish, and one cannot resolve it!