(Mishnah): 'Your daughters from me will live in my house and be fed from my property until they get married' - he is obligated (even if he did not write so in the Kesuvah), for it is a stipulation of Beis Din.

(Gemara - Rav Chisda): [If the daughters] became Bogeros, they lost their rights to be fed. If they married [after Bagrus], they lost Parnasah (a 10th of the estate that a Yesomah (orphan girl) receives when she marries).

(R. Chiyah - Beraisa): If they became Bogeros, but did not marry, or they married, but did not become Bogeros, [in both cases] they lost food, but they did not lose Parnasah.

(R. Avun citing Heila): [Rav Chisda and R. Chiya argue about a Bogeres who married, whether or not she lost Parnasah, but] they argue about a widow who claims against the heirs. She says, I did not receive my Kesuvah, and the heirs say 'no, you received your Kesuvah';

Before she married, the heirs must bring a proof that she received her Kesuvah. (If not, she collects.) After she married, she must bring a proof that she did not receive her Kesuvah [in order to collect. We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.]

Question (Mishnah): If a Yesomah's mother or brothers married her off, and they wrote to her 150 Zuz, after she matures, she can take from them [the 10th that she should have received].

Inference: This is because she was a minor (an adult marries herself off), but if she was an adult (even a Na'arah), she pardoned! (This is unlike Rav Chisda and R. Chiyah.)

Answer: This is because she received part [of Parnasah. Rav Chisda and R. Chiyah discuss one who received nothing.]

Support: Did not R. Avina, citing R. Asi, say that if a Bechor took a share like a Pashut (not a firstborn), the Chazakah is that he pardoned [his extra share]? Also here, if an adult took part [of her Parnasah, she pardoned]!

Rebuttal (R. Yosi bei R. Bun): [A Bechor who took like a Pashut] did not take anything from his extra share! (Then, we say that he pardoned. If an adult took part, we can say that she did not pardon!)

Note: The one who brought a support holds that receiving anything, even a Pashut share, is like receiving part. Alternatively, dividing equally is taking part of Bechorah. E.g. if there are three sons, the Bechor should get half, and each Peshut gets a quarter. If everyone took a third, the Bechor took part of his extra quarter. R. Yosi bei R. Bun holds that this is not part of Bechorah. He totally pardoned it, and then each Pashut gets a third. (PF)

A case came in front of R. Mana, and he wanted to rule like Rav Chisda.

Question (R. Chananyah - R. Chiyah's Beraisa): If they became Bogeros, but did not marry, or they married, but did not become Bogeros, they lost food, but they did not lose Parnasah.

Retraction (R. Mana): I say like a teaching [of Amora'im], and you say a Beraisa. The teaching is Batel due to the Beraisa.

Question (Ravin bar Chiyah, to R. Ze'ira): If he had Bi'ah with her while she was still in her father's house - do Tana'im of the Kesuvah apply from now, or only [after Bi'ah] in the way of Nisu'in (when she enters his Reshus)?

Question (R. Bun bar Chiyah, to R. Ze'ira): If she pardoned her Kesuvah to him, what is the law? She lost her rights - [do we say that] her sons' rights are not lost?