If there were two daughters and one son, and the first daughter received a tenth, and the second did not take a tenth [of what remains] before the son died - R. Chaninah thought to say that the second receives a tenth [of what remains], and the rest they share equally.

Rebuttal (R. Yochanan): That (a tenth) is when she does not have [property] to finance herself. However, here she can sell the rest (her half of the remaining 90%) and be financed through it!

(R. Tavi citing R. Yoshiyah): R. Chaninah holds that if [a Yesomah] takes [Parnasah] from Meshubadim, all the more so she takes from what is in front of her (the remainder of the estate, before she divides with her sister)!

R. Yochanan holds like he taught elsewhere, for R. Ze'ira citing R. Yochanan said that she does not collect [Parnasah from Meshubadim];

Who [holds that] she collects [Parnasah from Meshubadim]? R. Chaninah holds that she collects.

An estate of orphans was deposited with R. Yosa. There were [girls] who needed Parnasah. The case came in front of R. Elazar and in front of R. Shimon bar Yakim;

R. Shimon ben Yakim: Is it not better that they be financed from their father, than to be financed from Tzedakah?!

R. Elazar (to R. Shimon bar Yakim): A matter that if it came in front of our Rebbeyim, they would not touch it (they were unsure whether or not Parnasah is collected from Metaltelim), will we do an action?!

R. Yosi: I will give to them - if the [male] orphans will protest, I will give to them [from my money, the amount that I gave to the daughters].

Even so, they saw and did not protest.

Question (R. Ze'ira, to R. Yosi): How do we rule in practice?

Answer (R. Yosi): [We rule] like R. Chaninah.

Support: A case occurred, and they did like R. Chaninah.

(R. Avun citing R. Heila): [If there were two daughters and one son, and the first daughter received a tenth, and the second did not take a tenth before the son died,] we view the property (that they will inherit) as if it was desolate (it is not used to marry off the second. Rather, the second takes a tenth for Parnasah, and the rest they share equally, like R. Chaninah said above. - TAL TORAH)

(Mishnah - R. Meir): If Levi gave money to David for Levi's daughter (for her dowry or to buy a field for her), and she says 'I trust my husband (give the money to him)', David should do like he was instructed;

R. Yosi says, even if he bought a field for her and she wanted to sell it, she could. It is as if it is already sold! (Therefore, we heed her.)

This applies to an adult; but the actions of a minor are void.

(Gemara): Our Mishnah discusses when she said so during Eirusin, but if she said so during Nisu'in, even R. Meir agrees [that the third party gives them to her husband].

If [her father] gave the money to a third party during Nisu'in, this is an argument [of the following Tana'im. R. Meir holds that we fulfill the Mes' words, and Chachamim say that we give their needs, lest they need to take from Tzedakah. - NO'AM YERUSHALMI];

If one said 'give a Shekel (half a Sela) to my sons each week', and they need a Sela, we give to them a Sela. [If he said] 'give to them only a Shekel', we give to them a Shekel;

For food for the wife and daughter, whether he said 'give', or he said 'do not give' [we give to them what they need].

(Beraisa - R. Shimon ben Gamliel): R. Meir used to say, if one said 'give a Shekel to my sons each week', and they need a Sela, we give to them a Shekel, and the rest they are financed from Tzedakah;

Chachamim say, they collect [their needs] until the property is finished, and the rest they are financed from Tzedakah.

(R. Yosi): This answers the question [asked to] Chilfa;

They say that he sat by the river bank, [and said whoever will say a Beraisa of [the academy of] R. Chiyah Ruba (i.e. a Tosefta), and I will not bring a source from a Mishnah, they will throw me to the river.

Question: What would he answer (is the source of this Beraisa from a Mishnah)?

Answer (Mishnah): The third party does like he was told to do with the property entrusted to him.

(Continuation of Beraisa): [If he said] 'if [my sons] die, others should inherit in place of them' [whether he said 'give', or he said 'do not give', we give to them only what he said].

Question: Didn't R. Avahu, citing R. Yochanan, say that with all expressions, a person can be Mezakeh, except for an expression of inheritance? (It helps only for one proper to inherit him.)

Answer: [We did] not [ask about one who said others should] 'inherit', rather, 'receive'.

Question (R. Ze'ira, to R. Mana): Do they argue here [only] in an expression of a gift?!

If one wrote all his property to two people like one - he wrote to this one in an expression of a gift, and to this one in an expression of inheritance - R. Elazar says, since this one acquired in an expression of a gift, this one acquired in an expression of inheritance;

(R. Yochanan): It seems that [the one to whom he gave] in an expression of a gift, he acquired. [The one to whom he gave] in an expression of inheritance, he did not acquire.

(R. Pinchas): A case came in front of R. Yirmeyah. He said, since R. Elazar said from tradition, and R. Yochanan said [only] 'it seems', the Halachah follows R. Elazar.

Question (R. Shmuel): Didn't R. Meir say (the Beraisa above, 'give a Shekel... if they die, others should inherit in place of them, and his words are fulfilled? Even if R. Yochanan said from tradition), and not 'it seems', is this anything?! (We do not follow him against a Tana, for he is not a Tana! The coming episode shows this.)

Didn't R. Yosah say in the name of R. Yochanan, if wool of a Bechor was mixed [with Chulin wool], it is Batel in a majority;

And R. Chiyah Tziporiya brought in front of R. Imi a Litra [of wool of a Bechor, mixed] in eight, and he did not rule for him [to permit,] for R. Yosa said 'does not a Mishnah teach this?' (We explained this like SEFER NIR.)

(Mishnah - Orlah 3:3): One who weaves a full Sit (the length one can distance his thumb from his index finger) of wool of a Bechor [into a garment], the garment must be burned. [If he wove this amount] of hair of a Nazir or of a Peter Chamor into Sak (sackcloth), the Sak must be burned.

Question (against R. Yochanan - Mishnah): Whether he wrote at the beginning, in the middle or at the end, an expression of a gift, his words are fulfilled.

Answer: There (R. Yochanan's law), he wrote to this one an expression of a gift, and to this an expression of inheritance. However, here (the Mishnah) he wrote to each one an expression of a gift, and to each one an expression of inheritance.

Question (R. Chagai, to R. Yosi): (In our Mishnah, why does R. Yosi say that the third party gives to her husband?) Does he not cause a loss to others (who would have inherited the money, if she died and the third party still held it)?!

Answer (R. Yosi): The case is, there are no brothers [of his daughter, who could inherit in such a case].

Question: Does he not cause a loss to his father's brothers?! (I.e. there are always other relatives who would have inherited!)

Answer (R. Chananyah brei d'R. Hillel): He wants to fix his daughter more than his [more distant] relatives. (If she gives the money to her husband, there will be Shalom Bayis.)