[24a - 26 lines; 24b - 36 lines]
1a)[line 7]îòåú ñúåîéïMA'OS SETUMIN- unspecified money; i.e. money that was set aside for the purchase of a set of Korbanos without designating which Korban would be purchased with which part of the money
b)[line 7]îòåú îôåøùéïMA'OS MEFURASHIN- specified money; money that was set aside for the purchase of a set of Korbanos where the owner designated which money would be used to buy each one of his Korbanos, a Chatas, an Olah, and a Shelamim
2)[line 8]éôìå ìðãáäYIPLU L'NEDAVAH (KAYITZ HA'MIZBE'ACH)
(a)In many places the Gemara states that when certain items are sold (e.g. Kodshim that become unfit to be offered on the Mizbe'ach) their value is designated as a Nedavah ("v'Yiplu Demeihem l'Nedavah"), a contribution towards a Korban. This money is used to purchase Korbenos Tzibur (offerings brought by the entire people) and not Korbenos Yachid (personal Korbanos). A person may also volunteer money as a Nidvas Tzibur. In both cases, the money is placed in one of the six Shofaros (boxes) kept in the Beis ha'Mikdash and is used to buy Korbenos "Kayitz ha'Mizbe'ach" to be sacrificed as Korbenos Olah (burnt offerings) when the Mizbe'ach is not otherwise in use (Shekalim 6b).
(b)(Rashi to Sukah 56a DH Kayitz explains that these offerings were also called "Kayitz" because they were like a "dessert" ("Kayitz" refers to cut figs, a common dessert food) to the Mizbe'ach.)
3a)[line 9]ìà ðäðéï åìà îåòìéïLO NEHENIN V'LO MO'ALIN- It is forbidden mid'Rabanan to derive benefit from them and if one does, he does not bring a Korban Me'ilah since money that is "destined for Yam ha'Melach," i.e. that must be destroyed, and animals that must be put to death, are not considered Kodshei HaSh-m (Me'ilah 3a)
b)[line 9]åìà îåòìéïV'LO MO'ALIN (ME'ILAH)
(a)It is forbidden to derive personal benefit from anything that is Hekdesh, as the Torah states, "Lo Suchal l'Echol b'Sha'arecha... u'Nedarecha Asher Tidor" - "You may not eat in your settlements... and your pledges [to Hekdesh] that you will pledge" (Devarim 12:17) (RAMBAM Hilchos Me'ilah 1:1-3). The minimum amount for which one transgresses this prohibition is a Perutah's worth of benefit.
(b)If someone benefited from Hekdesh intentionally, he receives Malkus and must pay to Hekdesh the amount that he benefited. However, the object from which he benefited remains Hekdesh.
(c)If someone benefited from Hekdesh unintentionally, the object loses its Kedushah. He must bring a Korban Me'ilah and repay Hekdesh the value of his benefit plus an additional fifth (of the ensuing total, or a quarter of the original value). This is true of any object that has Kedushas Damim (i.e. its value is consecrated to Hekdesh). An object that has Kedushas ha'Guf (i.e. an object with intrinsic Kedushah, such as the utensils used in the Beis ha'Mikdash or a live Korban that is used in the Beis ha'Mikdash "as is") does not lose its Kedushah under any circumstances (Rosh Hashanah 28a).
4)[line 12]ìçíLECHEM (REKIKEI NAZIR)
When a Nazir completes his period of Nezirus, he must offer three sacrifices: a male sheep as an Olah, a female sheep as a Chatas, and a ram as a Shelamim. Together with the Shelamim he brings 6 and 2/3 Esronos of Soles (fine flour), which are made into 20 loaves of Matzah, 10 Chalos (unleavened loaves) and 10 Rekikin (flat Matzos). He then shaves off his hair and burns it under the pot in which the Zero'a of the Shelamim is cooked (Bamidbar 6:18). (Sefer ha'Chinuch #377)
5)[line 17]ùëê ëúá ìä: ëì àçøéåú ãàéú ìéê òìé îï ÷ãîú ãðàSHE'KACH KASAV LAH: KOL ACHRAYUS D'IS LACH ALAI MIN KADMAS DENA- (a) because this is what he wrote for her [in the Kesuvah], "All [of your] liabilities [to bring obligatory Korbanos] that you have from before this time are upon me" (MEFARESH, ROSH 2nd explanation); (b) According to the Girsa SHE'KACH KOSEVES (LEI) [LO] "KOL ACHRAYUS D'IS LI ALACH MI'KADMAS DENA" - because this is what she writes to him in the receipt for the payment of her Kesuvah (if he divorces her), "All of your liability for my obligations from before this time (i.e. during the period in which they were married), [is absolved]" (TOSFOS, ROSH 1st explanation)
24b----------------------------------------24b
6)[line 6]ù÷îöúä îòéñúäSHE'KAMTZASAH ME'ISASAH- that she scraped together by being skimpy with her dough
7)[line 10]ìà úéúéá òì ëøòéêLO SEISIV! AL KAR'ICH!- Do not sit down, [but rather stand] on your feet! (TOSFOS DH Amar, ROSH)
8)[line 10]òã ãàîøú ìé äãà îéìúàAD D'AMRAT LI HADA MILSA- until you tell/explain to me the following: (a) In this list of the four rams (that are Korbenos Shalmei Nazir) that are not accompanied by loaves of bread, what is the source for the last one, "shele'Achar Kaparah," which is not an explicit Mishnah like the other three? (TOSFOS, 1st explanation); (b) which are the four rams that are not accompanied by loaves of bread? (According to this, the words "v'Elu Hen..." are part of Avuha bar Ihi's answer, and Shmuel's question is implicit) (ROSH, 1st explanation); (c) why does it say that there are only four rams that are not accompanied by loaves of bread? Actually, there is a fifth case [of Shachatan she'Lo k'Mitzvasan]! (According to this, all of the words "v'Elu Hen" (line 11) until "Lo Lechem v'Lo Zero'a" (line 34) are part of Shmuel's question) (TOSFOS, ROSH, 2nd explanations)