1)

(a)The Mishnah rules that, if after Reuven declares 'Hareini Nazir', Shimon and then Levi say 'va'Ani', they too are Nezirim - provided they say it within 'Toch k'dei Dibur' (the time it takes to say 'Shalom alecha Rebbi') of each other's declaration (See Tos. Yom-Tov).

(b)The Tana rules that if Reuven then has his Neder annulled - Shimon and Levi's Nezirus are annulled as well. But ...

(c)... if Levi is the one to have his Neder annulled - Reuven and Shimon remain Nezirim.

2)

(a)The Tana also rules that if, after Reuven declares 'Hareini Nazir', Shimon says 'Pi ke'Fiv' or 'Se'ari ki'Se'aro', he too, is a Nazir. For the Neder to take effect, he needs to add to ...

1. ... Pi ke'Fiv - 'mi'Yayin'.

2. ... Se'ari ki'Se'aro' - 'mi'Lehigazeiz' (from being cut).

3)

(a)With regard to the husband annulling his wife's Neder, in a case where ...

1. ... a man declares 'Hareini Nazir' and his wife says 'va'Ani' - he is permitted to annul her Neder, whilst his remains intact.

2. ... a woman declares 'Hareini Nazir and her husband says 'va'Ani' - then he cannot annul it ...

(b)... because by declaring 'va'Ani', he is in essence, upholding her Nezirus.

4)

(a)In a case where the husband declares 'Hareini Nazir ve'At', his wife will become a Nazir - if she answers 'Amen' (See Tos. Yom-Tov).

(b)The difference between this case and the reverse one, where the wife declares 'Hareini Nezirah ve'Atah', and the husband says 'Amen' is - that, whereas in the former, the husband is able to annul his wife's Neder, in the latter case, he is not ...

(c)... because - by declaring 'Amen' he automatically upholds her Neder.

(d)And he is only able to annul the former - if, when he says 've'At', he is not making a statement (in which case he will be upholding her Neder), but asking a question (i.e. 'How about you?').

(e)In the former case, when he annuls his wife's Neder - his own Neder remains intact (See Tos. Yom-Tov).

5)

(a)The Mishnah rules that a Nezirah (a woman who is a Nazir) who drinks wine or who renders herself Tamei Meis - receives Malkos ...

(b)... even if, after she did so, her husband annulled her Neder ...

(c)... because a husband is only able to annul his wife's Nedarim from that moment on (not retroactively).

6)

(a)In the event that he annulled her Neder already before she sinned but without her knowledge, the Tana Kama rules - that she is Patur from Malkos.

(b)According to Rebbi Yehudah - she receives Makas Mardus ...

(c)... Malkos mi'de'Rabbanan (See Tos. Yom-Tov DH 'Rebbi Yehudah Omer' & 'Tispog').

7)

(a)When his Nezirus terminates, a Nazir is obligated to bring - three Korbanos, a Chatas, an Olah and a Shelamim.

(b)If a Nezirah has already designated her Korbanos when her husband annuls her Neder, in the event that the animals belong to him - the animals are subject to 'Yir'eh ... ' (they are sent into a field to romp around until they obtain a blemish and are then redeemed [See Tos. Yom-Tov]).

(c)In the event that they belong to her, the Mishnah rules that ...

1. ... the Chatas - must die (See Tos. Yom-Tov).

2. ... the Olah - is brought as an Olah.

3. ... the Shelamim - are brought as Shelamim.

8)

(a)In the latter case, the woman has one day in which to eat the Shelamim ...

(b)... because the time-period of a Shalmei Nazir is one day and one night.

(c)The Tana needs to say that it does not require loaves of bread - a regular Shalmei Nazir is brought together with loaves of bread.

(d)Despite that fact that all her property is Meshubad to her husband, the Nezirah nevertheless can own animals - if someone gave them to her on condition that her husband has no rights over them (See also Tos. Yom-Tov).

9)

(a)In a case where the woman designated, not animals, but money with which to purchase her Korbanos, the Mishnah draws a distinction between ...

1. ... 'Ma'os S'tumin' - money that has not been specified (for which Korban it has been designated).

2. ... and 'Ma'os Mefurashin' - money which has been specified.

(b)The ...

1. ... former - goes to Nedavah (See Tiferes Yisrael).

2. ... money for the Chatas in the latter - goes to the Yam-ha'Melach.

(c)When the Tana says 'Lo Nehenin ve'Lo Mo'alin, he means - that although it is not subject to Me'ilah (if someone uses it [See Tos. Yom-Tov), the Rabbanan forbade one to use it.

(d)The money for the Olah is used to purchase an Olah. If someone derives personal benefit from it - he is Chayav Me'ilah.

(e)The money for the Shelamim is used - to purchase a Shelamim (See Tos. Yom-Tov [but not loaves of bread]), which is brought on the Mizbe'ach.

10)

(a)The Tana Kama and Rebbi Akiva argue over when a Nazir can no longer annul his wife's Nezirus. According to the Tana Kama, it is from the moment the blood of one of his Korbanos has been sprinkled. Rebbi Akiva says - even if one of the Korbanos has merely been Shechted.

(b)The reason of ...

1. ... the Tana Kama is - because since sprinkling the blood of any one the Korbanos permits her to drink wine, it is no longer a Neder of Inuy Nefesh.

2. ... Rebbi Akiva is - because of the loss to Hekdesh (See Tos. Yom-Tov.

(c)The Tana Kama confines this however, to 'Tiglachas ha'Taharah' (where his wife was concluding her Nezirus Taharah). But by 'Tiglachas ha'Tum'ah', the husband is permitted to annul her Nezirus even later than that (See Tos. Yom-Tov) - because, seeing as she is obligated to start all over again, he can claim that he does not want to live with a 'disgusting' woman who does not drink wine (See Tos. Yom-Tov).

11)

(a)Rebbi however, maintains that even in the case of Tiglachas ha'Taharah, he may annul his wife's Nezirus after she has brought her Korbanos - because he can claim that he does not want to live with a bald woman.

(b)The Chachamim however, counter - that she can wear a wig (Se Tos. Yom-Tov).

(c)The Halachah in the Machlokes between ...

1. ... Rebbi Akiva and the Rabbanan is - like the Rabbanan.

2. ... Rebbi and the Rabbanan is - like the Rabbanan.

12)

(a)A father has the authority to declare his son a Nazir - until he he turns thirteen and grows two pubic hairs (See Tiferes Yisrael).

(b)His declaration is invalid - in the event that either the son himself or his relatives object.

(c)The father is obligated to bring the Korbanos of the son, both ...

1. ... when his term of Nezirus ends and ...

2. ... in the event that he becomes Tamei Meis.

(d)The source of the current Halachos is - 'Halachah le'Moshe mi'Sinai'.

(e)The Mishnah states - that a mother does not have the authority to declare her son a Nazir.

13)

(a)We just learned that if the son or his relatives objects, the father's declaration is invalid. And the same applies - there where the son or his relatives shaved him (the son) without actually stating that they do not accept the Nezirus.

(b)We do not contend with their objections however - if either the son began to observe the Dinim of Nezirus or he verbally accepted the Nezirus.

14)

(a)If, for one of the above reasons, the Nezirus is invalidated, the Korbanos that the father subsequently designated at the termination of the Nezirus - become invalid (to be brought as the Korbanos of a Nazir) too.

(b)Assuming that he already specified them ...

1. ... the Chatas- must die ...

2. ... the Olah - is brought as an Olas Nedavah, and ...

3. ... the Shelamim - as a Shalmei Nedavah.

(c)The time-period for eating the Shelamim is - one day and a night (as it was originally supposed to).

(d)The loaves of bread that a Nazir normally brings - are not brought.

15)

(a)Unspecified money that the father has designated - all goes to Nedavah (See Tiferes Yisrael 14).

(b)In the event that the money was specified, the money of ...

1. ... the Chatas - must be thrown into the Yam ha'Melach ...

2. ... the Olah - is used to purchase an Olah, which is brought on the Mizbe'ach, and ...

3. ... the Shelamim - to purchase a Shelamim ... .

(c)The difference between the money of the Chatas and the Olah that one purchases with the money of the Olah is - that whereas the former is not subject to Me'ilah (even though mi'de'Rabbanan one may not benefit from it), the latter is.

(d)The Shelamim may be eaten -for one day and a night.

(e)The Lachmei Todah - are not brought.

16)

(a)The Mishnah draws a distinction between a man and a woman 'shaving on his/her father's Nezirus' - using the money that the father designated for his own Nezirus for their Nezirus (as will be explained shortly).

(b)The Tana now rules - that a man may, whereas a woman may not ...

(c)... even if she is the sole heir.

(d)The source of this distinction too - is 'Halachah le'Moshe mi'Sinai'.

17)

(a)Rebbi Yossi rules that if a Nazir who designated unspecified money for his Nezirus, and after his death, his son declares himself a Nazir on condition that he uses the money for his Korbanos - his condition is invalid.

(b)According to the Chachamim - it is valid.

(c)Rebbi Yossi concedes that the son is permitted to use the money that his father designated - there where the father and the son were Nezirim simultaneously.

(d)The Halachah is - like the Chachamim.