(Mishnah): The only differences between one who is Mudar Hana'ah from his friend (Reuven vowed not to benefit from Shimon, or Shimon vowed 'Reuven may not benefit from me') and one who is Mudar Ma'achal (the vow forbids food) are Drisas ha'Regel (walking through the Madir's property) and [borrowing] Kelim not used for food. (They are permitted to a Mudar Ma'achal.)

One who is Mudar Ma'achal from his friend, [the Madir] may not lend to him a sifter, grinder or oven, but he may lend to him cloaks and rings, and anything not used for food;

In a place where such matters are rented, it is forbidden.

(Gemara) Question: [Our Mishnah implies that] matters used for food are forbidden [even to a Mudar Ma'achal. What is the reason?] Did he not vow from food?!

Answer (Reish Lakish): Our Mishnah means 'the only differences between one who is Mudar Hana'ah from his friend and one who is Mudar Hana'as Ma'achal (benefit that brings to food)...' (CHON ASHIR on our Mishnah - surely this means like the Bavli concludes, Hana'ah that leads to food, just the Yerushalmi does not elaborate to explain as much as the Bavli does.)

(D'Veis Rebbi - Beraisa): One who is Mudar Hana'as Ma'achal from his friend, [the Madir] may not lend to him a sifter, grinder or oven.

(Beraisa): However, he may lend to him cups, bowls and plates. They do not improve the food, just one enters the food [in them].

Pans and pots are forbidden. To grind or stomp [grapes, for the Mudar] is forbidden.

Questions: To harvest [grain for the Mudar Hana'ah], this is a question. To pick grapes [for him], this is a question. (Perhaps it is permitted, for much work remains before the food will be ready.)

What is Hana'as Ma'achal? E.g. it is an axe to cleave wood.

(Beraisa): However, he may lend to him an axe.

Question: We are thinking that this is a chopping axe. (If so, it is forbidden!)

Answer: The case is, it is a weeding axe. (You cannot learn from here about a chopping axe.)

Question (R. Avuna citing R. Yirmeyah): Yusta (a kind of sieve), since [the holes] are far apart, and it can be used to sift flour one may not lend it? (Or, since normally it is not used for this, it is permitted?)

Answer (R. Ba citing R. Ze'ira): It is like giving to him coins to buy a loaf. (These are normally rented. Our Mishnah forbids this, for it is like pardoning the rental. With the money saved, he can buy food.)

Question (R. Bun bar Chiyah): If so, it should be forbidden to lend to him coins, for it is like giving to him coins to buy a loaf!

Question (R. Avuna citing R. Yirmeyah): These youths, since they [are given to] eat and drink due to the ornaments on them, is it forbidden to lend to them? (We explained this like YERUSHALMI KI'PESHUTO.)

(Mishnah): If one is Mudar Hana'ah from his friend, [the Madir] may give the half-Shekel (that every person must give to Hekdesh each year for Korbanos) on behalf of him, and pay his debt, and return his Aveidah (something he lost);

In a place where people pay for returning Aveidos (compensation for wages that the finder lost while occupied with the Aveidah), the money goes to Hekdesh.

(Gemara - R. Ba bar Mamal) Question: (Chanan taught that if David went overseas and another fed David's wife, he is not reimbursed. Bnei Kohanim Gedolim said that he is reimbursed.) If one pays another's loan document without his knowledge - do Chanan and the sons of Kohanim Gedolim argue about this?

Answer (R. Yosi): The reason for Bnei Kohanim Gedolim is, there, it never crossed his mind that his wife will starve to death. However, here he can say 'I would have appeased [my creditor], and he would pardon me!'

Question: Exert yourself [and you will find the answer]! If he had a security [how can we answer]?

Answer: [He can say] 'I would have appeased him, and he would return my security to me.'

Question: This applies to a creditor who is not Dochek (pressing to be paid). Do we say so even about a Dochek creditor?

Answer: We learn from [our Mishnah]. If one is Mudar Hana'ah from his friend, he may give the half-Shekel on behalf of him;

If one did not give his Shekel, do they not take a security from him?! This teaches that we say so even about a Dochek creditor [like Hekdesh].

Support (Mishnah): He may offer for him Kinim (Korbanos ha'Of) of a Zav, Zavah, Yoledes (one who gave birth), Chata'os and Ashamos. (OHR SOMAYACH Hilchos Nedarim 6:5 - the Yerushalmi explains that the Madir offers his own birds or animals for the Mudar, unlike the Bavli, which explains that the Madir (a Kohen) offers the Mudar's Korban.)

Is this not when [the Mudar] did not give anything to him? Also here, [he pays another's debt] even though he did not receive anything from him (and he cannot demand to be repaid).

(R. Yehoshua ben Levi): The only case in which one is Nitfas (needs to pay) for his friend, and [the latter] must give to him (what he paid), is the king's tithe and head-tax. (It is customary to force one to pay these for another.)

(Rav): Anyone who is Nitfas for his friend, he must give to him.

Source (for Rav - Mishnah): If one stole a field and extortionists took it - if [extortion] is rampant in the area, he says 'your field is in front of you.' If [they took it] due to the Gazlan, he must give to him another field [of the same value. We explained this like the ROSH.]

Rebuttal: Did he not hear that R. Yochanan said, they made a fine for a Gazlan? (According to letter of the law, he need not pay, for land is not stolen.)

Question (R. Avin): The great Dahavah (if one was Nitfas for it, what is the law? This is a tax that the king takes when needed, like "Madhevah" - Yeshayah 14:4.)

Answer: R. Yosi bei R. Bun and R. Chiya bar Lulainu, both citing Shmuel, [argued about this]. One said that it is like the king's tithe and head-tax, and one said that it is not like the king's tithe and head-tax. (We explained this like SEFER NIR, Kesuvos 13:2.)