Question (Ri): Perhaps only due to Mar'is Ayin it is forbidden mid'Rabanan, like one who ties [a Kam'ia] to a bracelet or ring (61a-b). Now (in such a case), even if he takes it [in his hand], there is not an Isur Torah!

Answer (Ri): "He may not hold it in his hand" connotes even in his Kometz (in his palm and concealed under by his fingers], that there is no Mar'is Ayin. Rather, there is an Isur Torah.

Implied question: According to the opinion that everything that Chachamim forbade due to Mar'is Ayin is forbidden even in an inner room (where no one sees him, we can say that this is why it is forbidden)!

Answer: Here it is not applicable to decree, for even if he stands in the market and carries it in his Kometz, there is no Mar'is Ayin.

Assertion: The text does not say "the Dalet and Yud of Tefilin", like is proven above (28b) regarding Rav Yosef's teaching that [only Tahor species] are Kosher for Meleches Shamayim, and we establish it to discuss the straps [of Tefilin];

[The Gemara] did not ask that [we already know this, for] the Dalet of Tefilin is a tradition from Sinai, like we asked [there] about the Shin.

Explanation (R. Tam): This refers to being liable a Chatas. (Tosfos ha'Rosh - do not say that a man may not go out wearing a ring with a stamp, just like a woman may not go out with a ring without a stamp. We do not decree lest men take off to show. We said (61a-b) that one may not go in Reshus ha'Rabim with a Kam'ia tied to a ring. This implies that one may go out with a ring!)

Explanation: [Since women are exempt, Tefilin] is a load, and it should be forbidden.

Question: This is Hotza'ah k'Le'acher Yad (unskillfully), which is permitted due to [avoiding] disgrace to Tefilin!

Answer: Since it is a load, and he can come to a Chiyuv Chatas when he takes it out without a Shinuy, we do not permit due to disgrace to Tefilin.