(R. Elazar): Limbs and Chelev that were not consumed yesterday [and not at night], we make a fire and burn them by themselves. We override Shabbos for them.

Support (R. Yakov bar Acha citing R. Shmuel bar Aba - our Mishnah): Every day there were four Ma'arachos.

Question: How do we learn from here? (Perhaps it does not refer to Shabbos!)

Answer (R. Mana - Mishnah): Today there were five. (Since the Ma'arachah for yesterday's limbs and Chelev overrides Yom Kipur, it overrides also Shabbos.)

Question (R. Bun bar Chiyah, to R. Ze'irah): Something [burning limbs and Chelev] that is not Me'akev, is it Docheh [Shabbos]?!

Answer (R. Ze'irah): Witnesses [who saw] the new moon - they are not Me'akev (Beis Din can be Mekadesh the month without them), and they are Docheh!

A Mishnah there (Rosh Hashanah 1:9) says that [if witnesses saw the new moon within] a journey of a night and a day [of Yerushalayim], they are Mechalel Shabbos and go for Edus ha'Chodesh.

Question: What is the source for a Ma'arachah of Yom Kipur?

Answer (R. Yirmeyah citing R. Pedas): "Gachalei'' [already connotes that they are flaring] - why does it say "Esh''?

Answer: This teaches that [the Ma'arachah] is Batel to its coals (it has no other purpose - PNEI MOSHE.)

Perhaps Gachalei are flickering [coals]! It says "Esh''. Perhaps "Esh'' refers to a flame! It says Gachalei. How [do we fulfill both]? He takes flaring coals.

What is the source that the fire is Batel to coals? It says "Gachalei Esh.''

(R. Yehoshua ben Levi): Lechem ha'Panim is not disqualified at the time of Masa'os (when the Mishkan is dismantled and the Shevatim travel).

(R. Yochanan): Lechem ha'Panim is disqualified at the time of Masa'os.

(R. Chiyah citing R. Yehoshua ben Levi): "Ka'asher Yachanu Ken Yisa'u'' - just like when they are encamped, it is not disqualified, also when they travel it is not disqualified.

(R. Ami citing R. Yehoshua ben Levi): "V'Nasa Ohel Mo'ed Machaneh ha'Leviyim b'Soch ha'Machanos'' - it is as if it is amidst the Machanos.

(R. Yakov bar Acha citing R. Ami citing R. Elazar): One who burns Kodshim outside at the time of Masa'os, he is lashed.

(R. Yochanan): Kodshim are Nidchim (disqualified due to Yotzei) at the time of Masa'os. Tamei people separate, each from his Mechitzah (in which he is forbidden, i.e. a Zav must leave Machaneh Levi, and a Metzora must leave Machaneh Yisrael).

(R. Yosah): Rabanan always say that when the Paroches was removed (i.e. at the time of Masa'os), the Mechitzos are permitted to Zavim and Metzora'im.

A Beraisa supports this one (R. Yehoshua ben Levi), and a Beraisa supports this one (R. Yochanan).

A Beraisa supports R. Yehoshua ben Levi. [It says about Lechem ha'Panim] "Tamid'' - Tamid, even on Shabbos; Tamid, even b'Tum'ah. Lo Sichveh - even during the Masa'os. What did they do [about the fire on the Mizbe'ach] at the time of Masa'os? They covered it with a pot. R. Yehudah says so.

A Beraisa supports R. Yochanan. R. Shimon says, even at the time of Masa'os, they removed its ashes, for it says "v'Dishnu Es ha'Mizbe'ach u'Farsu Alav Beged Argaman.''

If [fire on] the Mizbe'ach was burning, would the purple garment not be burned?! (Rather, there was no fire at the time. Likewise, Tamid of Lechem ha'Panim did not apply at the time.)

Question: How does R. Yehudah answer this?

Answer: They covered [the fire] with a pot (and the garment was over the pot).

Question: How does R. Yehudah fulfill "v'Dishnu Es ha'Mizbe'ach''?

Answer: They satiated it [with limbs and Chelev and fire, even at the time of Masa'os], like R. Yudah bar Pazi said "v'Achal v'Sava v'Dashen'' (Dishun is an expression of satiation.)