(Mishnah): If he said 'this is your Get from today if I die from this sickness', and he recovered enough to walk in the market, then fell sick and died, we evaluate:

If he died from the initial illness, it is a Get. If not, it is not a Get.

(If a Get was given 'from today if I die',) the husband and wife may not be together alone, rather, only in front of witnesses. Even a slave or a Shifchah [suffices], except for her Shifchah, for she feels no shame in front of her Shifchah.

Question: What is her status in the interim?

Answer #1 (R. Yehudah): She is like an Eshes Ish in every way;

Answer #2 (R. Yosi): She [has the stringencies of being] divorced and not divorced.

(Gemara): If one overate beans [and died, we do not say that this killed him. Rather,] he is like one who died from that illness.

[If he overate] the shells of the beans themselves and did not get up, he is like one who did not die from that illness.

'If I die from this sickness', and a rockpile fell on him or a snake bit him, it is not a Get, for he did not die from this sickness. 'If I will not get up (recover) from this sickness', and a rockpile fell on him or a snake bit him, it is not a Get, for he did not get up from that sickness.

(Beraisa): Even one who is dangerously ill (may not be secluded after giving a conditional Get. We are concerned lest they have Bi'ah.)

(R. Yakov bar Acha): [Such] a case occurred. Once he had Bi'ah, he died.

Question: Are a slave and Shifchah believed?! (If Kosher witnesses know that they were secluded, we are concerned lest he had Bi'ah with her l'Shem Kidushin, so if he dies, she needs Chalitzah. A slave or Shifchah is not believed to say that they were there, and there was no Bi'ah!)

Answer: The witnesses know that when they were secluded, a slave or Shifchah was there. (We are not concerned lest they had Bi'ah in front of the slave);

This is like [a Beraisa teaches] - if she was secluded with [her ex-husband] in front of two [witnesses who know that they are alone], she needs a second Get. [If they were secluded] in front of one, she does not need a second Get. (Even if they had Bi'ah, Kidushin in front of one witness is Batel.)

[If they were secluded] in front of one [witness] in the morning, and in front of another one in the afternoon - a case occurred and R. Eliezer ben Tradyon asked Chachamim, and they said that this is not seclusion [to obligate a second Get].

If she was secluded with him long enough to have Bi'ah - we are concerned for Bi'ah, and we are not concerned for Kidushin.

Note: Do not say that the concern for Bi'ah applies to a divorcee from Eirusin; she becomes a Safek Be'ulah. We are concerned for Bi'ah only if there was Nisu'in, for they were intimate (Gitin 8:9, Bavli 81b)! Rather, if a Bas Kohen was married to a Kohen, if the Get took effect and they had Bi'ah, she is disqualified to Terumah. (SEFER NIR).

(R. Yosi bei R. Yehudah): We are concerned even for Kidushin.

Explanation #1 (of the Beraisa - R. Yirmeyah): If she was secluded with him long enough to have Bi'ah - we are concerned for Bi'as Zenus, and we are not concerned for Kidushei Bi'ah;

If she was not secluded with him long enough to have Bi'ah, we are not concerned for anything.

(R. Yosi bei R. Yehudah): [In the former case] we are concerned even for Kidushin.

Explanation #2 (R. Yosi): If she was secluded with him long enough to have Bi'ah - we are concerned for Bi'as Zenus, and we are not concerned for Kidushei Bi'ah;

If she was secluded with him long enough to have Bi'ah, we are not concerned for Kidushei Kesef.

(R. Yosi bei R. Yehudah): We are concerned even [in the latter case] for Kidushei Kesef (PNEI MOSHE).

(R. Avin): (In a Mishnah (8:9), Beis Shamai say that if a man spent the night with his ex-wife in an inn, he need not give her another Get. Beis Hillel require another Get.) Beis Shamai hold like Rabanan (the first Tana), and Beis Hillel hold like R. Yosi bei R. Yehudah.

Question: For what matter [does R. Yehudah say in our Mishnah says that she is like an Eshes Ish]?

Answer #1 (R. Lazar): It is to inherit her;

(Tosefta 5:4): He has rights to her Metzi'os, earnings and he can annul her vows.

(R. Ze'ira): [R. Lazar] teaches that she is like an Eshes Ish in every way (not only for what the Tosefta taught - RIDVAZ).

Question: R. Yehudah contradicts himself! There (in Yoma), he says that [we prepare a second wife for the Kohen Gadol, for death is common (perhaps his wife will die; he must be married to do Avodas Yom Kipur), and here he says that death is not common! (He considers her fully married; we are not concerned lest this is just before his death, and she is divorced.)

Answer: There [he is concerned for death] for the [Kaparah of] the Tzibur. Here [he is not concerned for death] for an individual;

(Beraisa - R. Yehudah): There was no box for Kinim (money to buy birds, for people who need to offer Chatas ha'Of and Olas ha'Of) in Yerushalayim, due to a mixture, lest one [of the people who put in money] die, (and money of his Chatas is mixed with the others' money), and it turns out money of a Chatas that must die is mixed with [the others' coins, so we cannot offer any of them. RIDVAZ - since this affects many people, it is like a matter of the Tzibur.]

Question: What is the law of her Bi'ah [with another man]?

Answer: Some teach that her Bi'ah is clear (if her husband died, retroactively she was divorced from when she received the Get. If he does not die, she was married the entire time, and there is a Chiyuv Chatas for the Bi'ah if they were Shogeg.) Some teach that her Bi'ah is Safek;

The one who says that her Bi'ah is Safek, he brings Asham Taluy. The one who says that her Bi'ah is clear, if he died, [the Bo'el] is exempt. If he did not die, he brings a Chatas.