(Mishnah): R. Gamliel and R. Eliezer say, if a single girl is pregnant and she claims that the father is Ploni, a Kohen, she is believed;

R. Yehoshua says, we do not trust her words. Rather, the Chazakah is that she is pregnant from a Nasin or Mamzer, unless she brings proof to her words.

(Gemara - R. Lazar): All agree that the child is a Shetuki.

Support (Beraisa): What is the matter [that they argue about]? It is testimony about the woman herself, but the child, all agree that he is a Shetuki.

Rebuttal (R. Yochanan): The Beraisa said Stam 'Shetuki.' (This could means that we silence (withhold) him from inheriting his father's property, but his lineage is Kosher, for) we find that a Shetuki can be a Kohen Gadol!

How can this be? A group of Kohanim passed by, and one of them separated and had Bi'ah [with her]. We find that the child is a Shetuki (from his father's property, for we do not know who is his father, but he is a Kosher Kohen, and can be a) Kohen Gadol!

Version #1 (R. Lazar): A widow of an Isah (a family into which a Pasul became mixed) is Kosher to Kehunah, but her daughter is Pasul!

Rebuttal (R. Yochanan): The one who is Machshir her, he is Machshir her daughter.

Inference (R. Yakov bar Acha): He said only 'according to the one who is Machshir.' This implies that there is another opinion, who disqualifies.

Who is Machshir? It is R. Meir. Who disqualifies? It is Rabanan;

(Beraisa): What is a Kosher Isah? It is one that has no Mamzer, Nasin or slaves of kings;

R. Meir says, any [family] that has none of these, the daughter is Kosher to Kehunah.

However, a family in which a Pesul was mixed, R. Meir says, one checks until four mothers, and marries;

Chachamim say, one always checks [even if no Pesul was mixed in].

Version #2 (R. Yirmeyah citing R. Ze'ira) Question: R. Lazar did not say so, rather, he asked R. Yochanan - the widow of an Isah, what is her [status? May she marry a Kohen?]

Answer (R. Yochanan): She is Kosher.

Question (R. Lazar, to R. Yochanan): Her daughter - what is her [status]?

Answer (R. Yochanan): According to the opinion that is Machshir her (the mother), she (the daughter) is Kosher.

Assumption: According to R. Lazar (who said above that all agree that the child is a Shetuki), a Shetuki is Pasul. According to R. Yochanan, a Shetuki is Kosher.

Rejection: Even R. Yochanan holds that a Shetuki is Pasul. He answered [R. Lazar] according to [R. Lazar's] opinion;

According to your opinion, that you say [that the Beraisa proves that all disqualify a Shetuki], even Stam 'Shetuki' [can be Kosher], we find that a Shetuki can be a Kohen Gadol!

How can this be? A group of Kohanim passed by, and one of them separated and had Bi'ah [with her]. We find that the child is a Shetuki (silenced from his father's property, i.e. he does not inherit him, and he can be a) Kohen Gadol!

R. Ze'ira's words show that a Shetuki is Kosher;

Question (R. Ze'ira, to R. Yosi): Is [a Shetuki Kosher] even regarding family (is his mother believed to say that her daughter is Kosher, to permit men to marry her)?

Answer (R. Yosi): So said Reish Lakish - there, a Mishnah teaches that about family (before one may marry a woman, he must check four mothers), but here, regarding Kodshim outside the Mikdash (e.g. Terumah, his mother is believed. We must say that a Shetuki is Kosher, just it is a stringency of lineage to check mothers.)

R. Shmuel bar Rav Yitzchak's words show that a Shetuki is Pasul;

Question (R. Shmuel bar Rav Yitzchak): If so (R. Gamliel and R. Eliezer say that she is believed), there is no Shetuki according to R. Gamliel and R. Eliezer, rather, only according to R. Yehoshua!

Retraction (R. Shmuel bar Rav Yitzchak): There is a Shetuki [even] according to R. Gamliel and R. Eliezer, when she is silent, or even if you will say that she speaks - she says, I do not know [the lineage of the father].