The Mishnah taught: R. Meir said - (If he used) Maaser Sheni, whether shogeg or meizid, she is not betrothed.

R. Abahu citing R.Yochanan: (The reason that when he betrothed b'shogeg with Maaser Sheni, it is not valid) - he does not wish to transgress a Torah law, so he would not have betrothed her had he known that it was Maaser Sheni.

R. Zeira: Concerning the two cases in the Mishnah of Maaser Sheni b'shogeg and Hekdesh b'shogeg, that neither is a valid Kidushin, one of them is because he would not want to transgress the Torah and the other is because she would not want it...

R. Yona: Concerning Hekdesh, he would not want to transgress (but she would not mind, since she is receiving something) and concerning Maaser Sheni, she would not want to receive it (as she would then be required to take the produce to Yerushalayim, but he would not mind using it for Kidushin).

R. Avin: Concerning Hekdesh, neither would want to benefit from Hekdesh, and concerning Maaser Sheni, he would not mind using it but she would not want to (since she would then need to bring it to Yerushalayim).

R. Yosa citing R. Pedaya: (The reason that she is betrothed if he used Hekdesh b'meizid), is because Hekdesh can become chulin even without giving redemption money.

Question (Beraisa): (The pasuk states (Vayikra 5, 15), "If a person commits treachery and sins) unintentionally (from Hash-m's holy things)- this excludes if it was done b'meizid...?!

Answer: This exclusion of meizid is from paying an extra fifth and bringing a Korban, but b'meizid, it does become chulin.

R. Chama bar Ukva citing R. Yosi ben Chaninah: It excludes Shelamim that if done b'meizid, they do become Chulin without redemption.

Question (Beraisa): The pasuk (ibid) says, "from (i.e. some of ) Hash-m's holy things but not "all of'' Hash-m's holy things?

Answer: This exclusion is from paying an extra fifth and bringing a Korban, but it does become chulin.