(Mishnah): One who buys two trees in his friend's [land], he brings and does not recite;

R. Meir says, he brings and recites.

If the tree (RA'AVAD) dried or was cut, he brings and does not recite;

R. Yehudah says, he brings and recites.

From Sukos until Chanukah, he brings and does not recite;

R. Yehudah ben Beseira says, he brings and recites.

(Gemara - R. Yosi ben Chaninah) Question: If one bought one tree, he did not acquire land. If he bought two, he did not acquire land. [If one] bought one, he does not bring [Bikurim] at all. [If he bought] two, he brings and does not recite?! (Why is it different?)

Remark (R. Lazar): Matters that Rabanan in the Beis Midrash were unsure about, you ask [me]?!

R. Yehudah considers a tree like straw (something of little importance attached to the grain. The Peros are due to primarily to the land, so even if the tree was cut, he brings and recites.)

(Mishnah): If one blessed Borei Peri ha'Adamah on tree fruits, he was Yotzei.

(R. Chizkiyah citing R. Yakov bar Acha): This is like R. Yehudah, for R. Yehudah considers a tree like straw (he attributes the Peros to the land).

(R. Yosi): It is like everyone. Tree fruits are included in Peros ha'Aretz, but Peros ha'Aretz are not included in Peros ha'Ilan.

Question (R. Bun bar Kahana, to R. Ila): If one sold a field with its Kamah (standing crop), may the buyer bring Bikurim from it? (SEFER NIR - after he harvests it, the land returns to the seller. If he sold it permanently, Mishnah 9 says that if he bought a tree and its land, he brings and recites!)

Answer (R. Ila): Why not?

Question (R. Bun bar Kahana): Until now, we discuss only moist (it still needs the ground). Is it even if it is dry?

Answer (R. Ila): It is even dry.

Question: If so, even harvested [grain], even wheat [from which the chaff was removed]!

Answer: Do we say that one who buys from the market, he brings Bikurim?! (It is only if he buys when it is attached.)

The following is obvious - if one sold to him Peros and left land for himself, the buyer does not bring, for he does not have land. The seller cannot bring, for he does not have Peros. (We explained this like GRA.)

If [the seller] returned and bought [the Peros] from him - we learn from the following (Mishnah);

If one gave to [a Zonah for her wage] Kodshim (animal Korbanos), they are permitted [to offer them]. Wine, oil, Soles or anything that like it is offered on the Mizbe'ach, it is forbidden.

[A Tosefta] taught about this ('anything that like it is offered on the Mizbe'ach' includes) clusters of grapes and sheaves of grain. (He gave to her Bikurim; from these species is offered on the Mizbe'ach, i.e. Nesachim and Menachos.)

Question: What is the case?

If he gave [them] to her for her Esnan (wage, and only due to this, she cannot bring them), do we say that one who buys from the market, he brings Bikurim?!

Answer: Rather, the case is, the vines were hers, and she sold to him their Peros, and he returned and gave them to her for her Esnan.

Inference: Because it was an Esnan (she cannot bring them), but if it were not an Esnan, she would bring [them]! This teaches that if [the seller] returned and bought them from him, he brings.

(Talmidim citing R. Yehoshua ben Levi): If he separated [Bikurim] before Sukos, and Sukos passed (before he brought them), he brings and does not recite;

If he separated before Chanukah, and Chanukah passed, they rot. [If he separated] after Chanukah, they did not get Kedushah.

Question: Do the Talmidim argue with R. Ze'ira, who taught [above] that any Bikurim that were proper to be permitted through reciting, they are permitted only through reciting]?!

Answer: They hold [like him]. The case is, he separated before Sukos with intent to bring them after Sukos (They were never proper for Keri'ah).

Question (Mishnah): We do not bring Bikurim from new [Peros] on (to exempt) old, and not from old on new.

Note: There is a Chiyuv to bring Bikurim from one's land. There is no Isur on Peros before bringing Bikurim. How to they 'exempt' others? The Mishnah means that if one has old and new, i.e. from different years, he must bring from both. Bringing new Peros does not exempt him from his obligation to bring old, and vice-versa.

Question: What is the case?

Suggestion: [He wants to bring] Peros that Hevi'u Shelish (reached a third of their growth) before Rosh Hashanah on Peros that Hevi'u Shelish after Rosh Hashanah. (This refers to wheat and barley; their Rosh Hashanah is Tishrei 1, and their year (old or new) depends on Hava'as Shelish.)

Rejection: Since they did not grow a third before Rosh Hashanah, clearly they did not take root before the Omer. They are forbidden until the Omer will come and permit them! (The Omer is in Nisan, which is after Chanukah. We said that one may not bring then!)

Answer: Rather, we discuss [other] Peros that had Chanatah (budding) before Tu bi'Shevat on Peros that had Chanatah after Tu bi'Shevat. (Their 'Rosh Hashanah' is Tu bi'Shevat, and their year depends on Chanatah.)

Inference: [He may not bring] because it is new on old, but new on new he may bring.

Assumption: We discuss [after Tu bi'Shevat, which is] after Chanukah!

Answer (R. Chinena): [He designated them on the tree] in their time (and brings them after Shevu'os. It can even discuss wheat and barley - GRA.)