1) TOSFOS DH Savar Lah Kevasei b'Chada
úåñôåú ã"ä ñáø ìä ëååúéä áçãà
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why we did not say so above.)
áëä''â äåä îöé ìùðåéé ìòéì ãàîø áùéèú ø''ù
(a) Implied question: We could have answered like this above (71b), that [R. Meir] said like R. Shimon!
àìà ðéçà ìéä ìàå÷åîé ëø''ò øáéä åàéëà äùúà ùìùä úðàé
(b) Answer: [Rav Dimi] prefers to establish [R. Meir] like R. Akiva, his Rebbi, and there is a three-way argument among the Tana'im.
2) TOSFOS DH Ketzirchem v'Lo Ketzir Mitzvah
úåñôåú ã"ä ÷öéøëí åìà ÷öéø îöåä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos points out that we make other Drashos from this word.)
áôø÷ ëì ùòä (ôñçéí ãó ëâ.) ãøéù ÷öéøëí ùìëí éäà åàéãê ÷öéøëí ãëì éùøàì
(a) Citation: In Pesachim (23a) we expound Ketzirchem - it will be yours, and the other opinion [there] expounds Ketzirchem of all Yisrael. (Tosfos there says that both opinions make two Drashos, for it could have written Ketzir, and it could have written Ketzircha to teach only one Drashah.)
3) TOSFOS DH Kerichos (pertains to the Mishnah, 71a)
úåñôåú ã"ä ëøéëåú (ùééê ìîùðä, áãó òà.)
(SUMMARY: Tosfos rejects Rashi's Perush.)
ôéøù á÷åðè' àìåîåú
(a) Explanation (Rashi): These are Alumos (big bundles).
åàé àôùø ìåîø ëï ëãîåëç ôø÷ àìå îöéàåú (ááà îöéòà ãó ëá:)
(b) Rejection: It is impossible to say so, like is proven in Bava Metzi'a (22b, which distinguishes between Alumos and Kerichos (small bundles)!
1. Note: Our text of Rashi on the Mishnah said "Alumim Keshurim." It seems that he explains that they are forbidden due to the tying, and not because they are big, for he explains that Tzevasim, which are permitted, are not tied.
4) TOSFOS DH Minayin she'Im Niktzar b'Yom Kasher v'Docheh Es ha'Shabbos
úåñôåú ã"ä îðéï ùàí ð÷öø áéåí ëùø åãåçä àú äùáú
(SUMMARY: Tosfos concludes that according to R. Akiva, only the Hakravah is Docheh Shabbos.)
ìøáé àìéòæø ãàîø (ãàé) [ãàôé'] àôùø ìòùåú îòøá ùáú ãåçä àú äùáú ðéçà
(a) Observation: According to R. Eliezer, who says that even if it is possible to do so before Shabbos, it is Docheh Shabbos, this is fine.
àáì ìø' ò÷éáà ìà éúëï àò''â ãîöåúå áìéìä ëéåï ãáãéòáã áéåí ëùø
(b) Question: However, according to R. Akiva, this cannot be! Even though the Mitzvah is at night, since b'Di'eved during the day is Kosher [why is it Docheh Shabbos]?!
åöøéê ìåîø ããåçä àú äùáú ìàå à÷öéøä ÷àé àìà àä÷øáä
(c) Answer: We must say that "it is Docheh Shabbos" does not refer to reaping, rather, to offering.
åäà ãì÷îï ããøéù ìéä îîåòãé ä' ùäëúåá ÷áò îåòã àçã ìëåìï åäëà îééúé ìä îú÷øéá
(d) Implied question: Below (72b) we expound from "Mo'adei Hash-m" - the Torah fixed one time for all of them (the Omer, Shtei ha'Lechem and the Korbanos that accompany them), and here we learn from "Takriv"!
ìàå ãå÷à ãäà èåîàä ðô÷à ìï ì÷îï îîåòãé ä' åäëà îééúé ìä îú÷øéá
(e) Answer: This is not precise, for Tum'ah we derive below from "Mo'adei Hash-m", and here we bring it from "Takriv".
5) TOSFOS DH Af d'Laylah b'Yom Lo
úåñôåú ã"ä àó ãìéìä áéåí ìà
(SUMMARY: Tosfos points out that here, this refers to the next day.)
ò''ë áéåí ùìîçøú ÷àîø ãàé áéåí ùìôðéå äøé ä÷èø çìáéí ãëùøéí áéåí ùçéèúï
(a) Assertion: You are forced to say that this refers to the day after, for if it refers to the day before, Haktarah of Chelev [refutes this. It] is Kosher on the day of Shechitah!
åúéîä ãà''ë îàé ÷ùä (ìéîà îúðé' ãìîà) [ö"ì ãéìîà îúðé' ã÷úðé - öàï ÷ãùéí] ð÷öø áéåí ëùø äééðå áéåí ùìôðéå ëä÷èøú çìáéí
(b) Question: If so, what was the question? Perhaps our Mishnah, which taught "if it was reaped during the day it is Kosher", refers to the day before, like Haktaras Chelev!
åé''ì ãìòðéï ÷öéøä ìà ùééê ìçì÷ áéï éåí ùìôðéå ìéåí ùìàçøéå ëãéìôéðï áøéù ôéø÷éï (ãó ñå.) ÷öéøä åñôéøä [ö"ì áìéìä - ùéèä î÷åáöú]
(c) Answer: Regarding reaping we cannot distinguish between the day before and the day after, like we learned above (66a) reaping and counting at night. (Since the next day is Pasul, the same applies to the day before.)
6) TOSFOS DH Ha Rebbi Ha R. Elazar b'Ribi Shimon
úåñôåú ã"ä äà øáé äà øáé àìòæø áøáé ùîòåï
(SUMMARY: Tosfos rules that it is Kosher only at night.)
ëñúí îùðä ãîâéìä (ãó ë:) äìëä ëãôøéùéú áøéù ôéø÷éï (ãó ñå. ã''ä æëø)
(a) Pesak: The Halachah follows the Stam Mishnah in Megilah (20b), like I explained above (66a DH Zecher).
7) TOSFOS DH Havei Acheres Tachteha
úåñôåú ã"ä äáà àçøú úçúéä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains that this is according to all opinions.)
áô''÷ ãéåîà (ãó æ.) îôøù ãàôéìå ìîàï ãàîø èåîàä äåúøä äéà áöéáåø îáéà àçøú ìäúéø ùéøéí
(a) Citation: In Yoma (7a) it explains that even according to the opinion that Tum'ah is Hutrah [totally permitted] b'Tzibur, he brings another to permit the Shirayim. (Even though Korbanos Tzibur are Kosher b'Tum'ah, one may not eat them, except for Pesach.)
8) TOSFOS DH b'Shitas R. Akiva Rabo Amrah
úåñôåú ã"ä áùéèú øáé ò÷éáà øáå àîøä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains that he does not hold totally like R. Akiva.)
îéìúéä ãø' ò÷éáà áôø÷ øáé àìéòæø ãîéìä (ùáú ãó ÷ì.) åáôñçéí áô' àìå ãáøéí (ãó ñè:) åì÷îï áùúé äìçí (ãó öå.)
(a) Reference: R. Akiva's teaching is in Shabbos (130a), in Pesachim (69) and below (96a).
åìà ñáø ìä ëååúéä ìâîøé àìà áääéà ãëì îìàëä ùàôùø ëå' ãôìéâ ø' àìéòæø åìà ñáø ìéä ëååúéä ãùîåúé äåà
(b) Observation: [R. Elazar b'Ribi Shimon] holds like [R. Akiva] only regarding any Melachah possible [to do it before Shabbos], for R. Eliezer argues with [R. Akiva], and [R. Elazar] does not hold like [R. Eliezer], for he was Shemuti (from Beis Shamai);
àáì áääéà ãîä çøéù øùåú ñáø ìä ëøáé éùîòàì åìà ëøáé ò÷éáà ãîå÷é ÷øà ìçøéù ùì òøá ùáéòéú
1. However, regarding "just like plowing is Reshus...", he holds like R. Yishmael, and unlike R. Akiva, for [R. Akiva] establishes the verse to discuss plowing in Erev Shemitah (Mo'ed Katan 3b. He has no source to permit reaping the Omer on Shabbos.)
9) TOSFOS DH Amai Dachi Shabbos Niktzerei me'Erev Shabbos
úåñôåú ã"ä àîàé ãçé ùáú ð÷öøéä îòøá ùáú
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why it would not override Shabbos.)
åàò''â ãìëúçéìä îöåúå áìéìä
(a) Implied question: L'Chatchilah, the Mitzvah is at night!
ëéåï ããéòáã ëùø ìà äåé ãåîéà ãúîéã ãëúéá áéä áîåòãå ìåîø ããçé ùáú åîñúáøà ããåîéà ãúîéã áòéðï:
(b) Answer: Since b'Di'eved it is Kosher [during the day], this is unlike the Tamid, about which it says "b'Mo'ado" to teach that it is Docheh Shabbos, and presumably, we require similar to the Tamid [to override Shabbos].
72b----------------------------------------72b
10) TOSFOS DH she'Ne'emar Bahen b'Mo'ado b'Mo'ado Afilu b'Shabbos...
úåñôåú ã"ä ùðàîø áäï áîåòãå áîåòãå àôéìå áùáú...
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains how we know that they are Docheh Shabbos and Tum'ah.)
ôñç ããçéà èåîàä àúéà ìï îãëúéá àéù ðãçä åàéï öéáåø ðãçéï åúîéã ããçé ùáú ãàîø ÷øà òåìú ùáú áùáúå
(a) Reference: We learn that Pesach overrides Tum'ah from "Ish" - [one man] is pushed off [until Pesach Sheni], but a Tzibur is not pushed off. The Tamid is Docheh Shabbos because it says "Olas Shabbos b'Shabbato";
åäãø éìôé îäããé áâæéøä ùåä ãëúéá áäå áîåòãå äëé àéúà áôñçéí áôø÷ àìå ãáøéí (ãó ñå.)
1. And afterwards we learn (Pesach and Tamid) from each other through a Gezeirah Shavah. It says about them "b'Mo'ado." It says so in Pesachim (66a).
11) TOSFOS DH Hukve'u v'Lo Hukve'u
úåñôåú ã"ä äå÷áòå åìà äå÷áòå
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explained this above.)
ôéøùúé áô' äúëìú
(a) Reference: I explained this above (46a DH Eizeh. If they are Hukve'u, he cannot change them to another Korban or redeem them.)
12) TOSFOS DH v'Elu Menachos. Ba'ah Chitin Lo ka'Miba'i Lan
úåñôåú ã"ä åàìå åîðçåú. áàä çéèéï ìà ÷îéáòéà ìï
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses why we need another source for Menachos of barley.)
ãîääåà ÷ø' ðô÷é îæàú úåøú äîðçä ãñúí îðçä áàä çéèéï äéìëê ääåà ÷øà ááàä çéèéï îééøé ëê ôé' á÷åðèøñ
(a) Explanation #1: [We do not ask about Menachos from wheat] because we learn from that verse "Zos Toras ha'Minchah", for a Stam Minchah is from wheat. Therefore, that verse discusses [Menachos] of wheat. So Rashi explained.
å÷ùä ãìòéì áôø÷ ëì äîðçåú áàåú îöä (ãó ðá:) ã÷àîø îðéï ìëì äîðçåú ùäï áàåú îöä å÷àîø ãëúéáà ëúéáà ãìà ëúéáà ëúéá æàú úåøú äîðçä
(b) Question: Above (52b) it says "what is the source that all Menachos are Matzah", and it says "those that are written, they are written. Those that are not written, it says Zos Toras ha'Minchah";
äåä ìéä ìîéîø ëé äëà úéðç áàä çéèéï áàä ùòåøéï îðà ìéä
1. We should have said like here, granted, Menachos of wheat [we learn from Zos Toras...] What is his source for Menachos of barley?
ìëê ðøàä ããå÷à äëà ãîééøé ìòðéï àëéìä ùùéøéäï ðàëìéï ìëäðéí ãìà ðô÷à ìï áàä ùòåøéï îæàú úåøú äîðçä îùåí ãùòåøéï äåà îàëì áäîä
(c) Explanation #2: Therefore, it seems that only here that we discuss eating, that Kohanim eat the Shirayim, we do not learn Menachos of barley from Zos Toras ha'Minchah, because barley is [primarily] animal food;
ëãîåëç áô''÷ ãôñçéí (ãó â:) ùòåøéï ðòùå éôåú à''ì öà åáùø ìñåñéí åìçîåøéí
1. Source #1: This is proven in Pesachim (3b). [Someone did not want to say that the wheat grew poorly, so he said] "the barley produced nicely." They told him "go tell the horses and donkeys!"
åúðï áôø÷ ùðé ãñåèä (ãó éã.) ëùí ùîòùéä îòùä áäîä àó ÷øáðä îàëì áäîä
2. Source #2: In Sotah (14a) it says "just like she did an animal act, also her Korban is animal food."
13) TOSFOS DH Im Eino Inyan l'Charevah Shel Chitin
úåñôåú ã"ä àí àéðå òðéï ìçøáä ùì çéèéï
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains the source for a Minchah of wheat without oil.)
ãîúøáéà îæàú úåøú àó òì âá ãôøùúà îééøé áùéù áä ùîï:
(a) Explanation: [It is not needed for a Minchah of wheat without oil,] for it is included from Zos Toras [ha'Minchah], even though the Parshah discusses Menachos that have oil.