Inference #1: If so, it is evident that according to Rebbi Yishmael, if whatever required sprinkling is poured, one is Yotzei (Zerikah bi'Chelal Shefichah).

Inference #2: And it is also evident that he holds that the Pesach requires Shefichah.

Support: And this is also evident in Perek ha'Ishah (Daf 89.), where the Gemara asks that 'Whereas Pesach requires Shefichah, Shelamim requires Zerikah?' and it answers 'what difference does it make; Does the Beraisa not say 'From where do we know that that if one pours something that requires sprinkling, one is Yotzei ... '?

Conclusion: So we see that he holds both rulings: that Pesach requires pouring and that sprinkling is included in pouring (i.e. 'ha'Nitnin'), since Zerikah requires standing at a distance and sprinkling the blood on the Y'sod (the foundation), whilst for Shefichah one stands on the Y'sod and pours.

Question: In Zevachim, in Perek Beis Shamai (Daf 37.) it implies that whoever holds that the Pesach requires Shefichah, cannot hold that if one pours something that requires Zerikah, one is Yotzei? And likewise vice-versa - Whoever holds that if one pours something that requires Zerikah one is Yotzei, cannot also hold that the Pesach requires Shefichah?

Source: The Gemara asks there 'But one needs the Pasuk of "ve'Dam Zevachecha Yishafech" for the Beraisa 'From where do we know that one is Yotzei if one pours something that requires Zerikah? Therefore the Torah writes "ve'dam Zeachecha Yishafech" '.

Source (cont.): And the Gemara answers that he holds like Rebbi Akiva, who says that neither is Zerikah included in Shefichah nor vice-versa - and the D'rashah 'From where do we know that one is Yotzei ... ' goes according to Rebbi Yishmael.

Source (cont.): Then the Gemara asks that we still need the Pasuk for the Beraisa where Rebbi Yishmael says 'Since it says "Ach B'chor Shor O B'chor Kesev ... es Damam Tizrok" ...

Source (cont.): We learn that the blood of a B'chor goes on the Mizbe'ach. From where do we know that Ma'aser and Pesach do too? The Pasuk says "ve'Dam Zevachecha Yishafech". And the Gemara answers that this goes according to Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili, who holds that the Pesach too, is sprinkled.

Source (cont.): The Gemara then asks how Rebbi Yishmael can learn two different things from the same Pasuk? And it answers that it is a Machlokes Tana'im as to what Rebbi Yishmael holds.

Conclusion: So we see that the Tana of Rebbi Yishmael above, that 'If one sprinkled something that requires Zerikah, one is Yotzei', which he learns from "ve'Dam Zevachecha Yishafech", does not hold like the other Tana of Rebbi Yishmael, who learns from the same Pasuk that 'The Pesach requires Shefichah'?

Answer: Rebbi Yishmael certainly holds of both, and the fact that one is Yotzei if one pours something that requires Shefichah he learns from a S'vara, because what difference can it make whether one sprinkles from a distance or pours from close? Whereas the Pasuk comes to teach us that the Pesach requires Shefichah.

Implied Question: And the Gemara did not answer this, when it asks how Rebbi Yishmael can learn two things from the same Pasuk ...

Answer: Because the D'rashah of Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili is simpler.

Rashi (on Sugya in Zevachim): There (in Zevachim) Rashi explains And Rebbi Yishmael, this Pasuk - 'of ' "ve'Dam Zevachcha Yishafech" ' How can he learn it for this? - 'that one is Yotzei if one poured something that requires sprinkling'.

Rashi ... (cont.): 'Because the Din of "Nitnin"' cannot go like Rebbi Akiva, because if it did, why does Rebbi Akiva say that "the B'rachah over the Pesach does not render the Shelamim Yotzei", seeing as the Shelamim is included in the Pesach and both can be poured, as we learn from the Din of "Nitnin" '?

Rashi ... (cont.): 'Moreover, even if Rebbi Akiva were to hold that "Pesach requires Zerikah", like Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili, then the two B'rachos ought certainly to render one another Yotzei?'

Rashi ... (cont.): 'And he (Rebbi Yishmael) also learns from the Pasuk that "Pesach requires Shefichah" '?

Rashi ... (cont.): And the Gemara answers that two Tana'im argue over Rebbi Yishmael - 'The Tana of Rebbi Yishmael who learns from "ve'Dam Zevachecha Yishafech" that "Pesach is poured", does not hold that "Pesach renders Yotzei the Shelamim". In fact, in this point, Rebbi Yishmael does not dispute Rebbi Akiva, because, since he learns from it that "Pesach requires Shefichah", he cannot then learn from it "Nitnin" '.

Rashi ... (cont.): 'Whereas the Tana of Rebbi Yishmael who learns from the Pasuk "Nitnin", does not hold that Pesach is poured, only sprinkled, like the Shelamim'.

Rashi ... (cont.): 'He disagrees with Rebbi Akiva however, in that he considers it a S'vara that the Pesach is the main Korban and the Shelamim, only secondary, in which case, although the Pesach exempts the Shelamim, the Shelamim does not exempt the Pesach'.

Rashi ... (cont.): 'The Yerushalmi (at the end of the tenth Perek) gives this reasoning'. Until here is the quote from Rashi.

Question: Earlier (at the beginning of the Dibur) Tosfos proved from the Gemara from two current sources that Rebbi Yishmael holds of both D'rashos?

Explanation #1: The Rashbam explains the Sugya here as follows: "If you want you can say that according to Rebbi Yishmael, Zerikah is included in Shefichah" - 'From what he says that "if one recited a B'rachah over the Pesach ... ", we can extrapolate that, in his opinion, the Pesach requires Zerikah'.

Explanation #1 (cont.): 'In that case, the Pasuk "ve'Dam Zevachecha Yishafech" is superfluous and teaches us that Zerikah is included in Shefichah", in which case if one pours all Nizrakin, one is Yotzei'.

Explanation #1 (cont.): 'And we do not have in our text "And Shefichah is included in Zerikah", since there is no such Korban that requires Shefichah Lechatchilah" '.

Question: But that is difficult from the Gemara in 'ha'Ishah' (Refer to the beginning of Tosfos)?

Explanation #2: Whereas R. Chayim Kohen explains 'If you want you can say that according to Rebbi Yishmael, Zerikah is included in Shefichah, and Shefichah, in Zerikah - 'This is the wording that is found in the old texts - meaning that all Korbanos require either Zerikah or Shefichah, and it makes no difference which'.

Explanation #2 (cont.): 'And the B'rachah over the Pesachim, the main Korban, exempts the secondary one (the Shelamim), but not vice-versa.

Question: He (Rebbi Yishmael) also holds that the Mitzvah by Pesachim is specifically with Shefichah, which is not Zerikah (See Maharsha)? (See also Tosfos Zevachim [37. DH 'T'rei Tana'im ... ').