(Mishnah): She may not go out with Ir Shel Zahav.

(Rav Yehudah): This is like Yerushalayim of gold.

Rabanan of Kisarin: It is Pros Tok Taklin (the form of Yerushalayim is on it, but it is not in the shape of the city).

A case occurred in which R. Akiva made for his wife Ir Shel Zahav. R. Gamliel's wife saw it, and envied her. She told her husband [who was the Nasi, so he would make one for her].

He told her "would you do for me like she did for him? She sold her braided hair (PNEI MOSHE) and gave [the money] to him, so he could learn Torah!''

A Mishnah there [in Eduyos records three laws said in front of R. Akiva.] Two of them were in the name of R. Eliezer. [One of them is that] a woman may go out with Ir Shel Zahav. (Some texts say that the second is "people who race [or incite] birds are Pasul for testimony mid'Oraisa.'')

(Beraisa): [If she went out with Ir Shel Zahav,] R. Meir obligates her.

Question: Granted, [the argument] between R. Meir and Rabanan is reasonable. R. Meir obligates, and Chachamim exempt;

[The argument] between R. Eliezer and Rabanan is reasonable. R. Eliezer permits, and Chachamim forbid.

[However, the argument] between R. Meir and R. Eliezer is difficult (it is too big). R. Meir obligates, and R. Eliezer permits?!

Answer (R. Inyeino bar Sisai citing R. Liezer): [R. Meir obligates only in Reshus ha'Rabim, and R. Eliezer forbids there. He permits only in a Chatzer, for he holds that] wherever Chachamim said "she may not go out, and if she went out, she is Chayav Chatas'', it is forbidden to go out with it to a Chatzer. (We explained this like NO'AM YERUSHALMI);

Wherever they said "she may not go out, and if she went out, she is not Chayav Chatas'', she may go out with it to a Chatzer.

Support (R. Ba bar Kohen citing Rav Sheshes - Mishnah): She may go out with Kevul or a wig to a Chatzer.

(R. Liya citing R. Shimon bar Chiya): Even where they said "she may not go out, and if she went out, she is not Chayav Chatas'', she may not go out with it to a Chatzer.

Implied question: A man, since he is not haughty (he will not remove it to show to his friend), is he permitted?

Answer: We learn from the following. R. Gamliel b'Ribi descended to stroll in his Chatzer on Shabbos, with a gold key in his hand. His colleagues rebuked him due to an ornament. (MEICHAL HA'MAYIM - a key is not an ornament, but the decree against ornaments, lest one carry four Amos in Reshus ha'Rabim, applies to it.)

Inference #1: What is made for an ornament is forbidden.

Limitation: This teaches [only] about what is made for this (men) and this (women. For such ornaments,) a man and a woman are the same. (We cannot learn to ornaments special for men. Perhaps there was no decree about them! We explained this like the ROSH (6:10) and HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA.)

Inference #2: Even where they said "she may not go out, and if she went out, she is not Chayav Chatas'', she may not go out with it to a Chatzer.