Yevamos Chart #2
Chart for Yevamos Daf 9a
THE CHATAS-OFFERINGS OF AN INDIVIDUAL AND OF A COMMUNITY
| TRANSGRESSIONS OTHER THAN AVODAH ZARAH (Vayikra 4) |
THE WORDS OF THE VERSE EXPOUNDED IN OUR SUGYA |
|
| 1 | *PAR* KOHEN MASHI'ACH | "l'Ashmas ha'Am" |
| 2 | *PAR* HE'ELEM DAVAR | "Aleha" "Vav" (the adjunctive prefix) "me'Eini" "Mitzvos" |
| 3 | *SE'IR* NASI | "Mitzvos" |
| 4 | CHATAS YACHID "Vav" (*KIVSAH* OR SE'IRAH) |
"Mitzvos" "Vav" (the adjunctive prefix) |
| TRANSGRESSION OF AVODAH ZARAH (Bamidbar 15) |
||
| 5 | AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY THAT SERVED AVODAH ZARAH (*PAR* L'OLAH, SE'IR L'CHATAS) |
"me'Eini" (1) |
| 6 | AN INDIVIDUAL WHO SERVED AVODAH ZARAH (2) (*SE'IRAH*) |
"Vav" (the adjunctive prefix) "Torah Achas" "b'Yad Ramah v'Nichresa" (3) |
Yevamos Chart #3
Chart for Yevamos Daf 9b
KEY:
"A" and "B" = the sisters who fall to Yibum (Rashi does give them names)
"1" and "2" = the brothers who died (Rashi calls them "Levi" and "Yehudah", sons of Yakov)
"3" and "4" = the surviving brothers who do Yibum (Rashi calls them "Reuven" and "Shimon")
THE CASES OF "HER SISTER WHO IS HER CO-YEVAMAH"
| THE ERVAH TO THE YAVAM |
THE SISTERS' RELATIONSHIP |
THE CASE(4) | |
| 1 | BITO (HIS DAUGHTER) |
Same mother | "3" raped a woman and bore "A". "4" raped (6) the same woman and bore "B".(4) |
| 2 | BAS BITO (HIS DAUGHER'S DAUGHTER) |
Same father | The daughter of "3" married a man and bore "A". The daughter of "4" married the same man and bore "B".(4) |
| 3 | BAS BNO (HIS SON'S DAUGHTER) |
Same mother | The son of "3" married a woman and bore "A". The son of "4" married the same woman (9) and bore "B".(4) |
| 4 | BAS ISHTO (HIS WIFE'S DAUGHTER) |
Same father | A man bore "A" and "B" from two different wives. "A"'s mother (9) married "3" and "B"'s mother (9) married "4".(4) |
| 5 | BAS BNAH (HIS WIFE'S SON'S DAUGHTER) |
Same mother | A woman bore "A" from one husband and "B" from another (6) "A"'s father's mother married "3" and "B"'s father's mother married "4".(4) |
| 6 | BAS BITAH (HIS WIFE'S DAUGHTER'S DAUGHTER) |
Same father | A man bore "A" and "B" from two different wives. "A"'s mother's mother married "3" and "B"'s mother's mother married "4".(4) |
| 7 | CHAMOSO (HIS MOTHER-IN-LAW) |
Same parents (7) |
"A" and "B" were sisters. "3" married the daughter of "A", and "4" married the daughter of "B".(4) |
| 8 | EM CHAMOSO (HIS MOTHER-IN- LAW'S MOTHER) |
Same parents (7) |
"A" and "B" were sisters. "3" married "A"'s daughter's daughter "4" married "B"'s daughter's daughter (4) |
| 9 | EM CHAMIV (HIS FATHER-IN- LAW'S MOTHER) |
Same parents (7) |
"A" and "B" were sisters. "3" married "A"'s son's daughter and "4" married "B"'s son's daughter.(4) |
| 10 | ACHOSO ME'IMO (HIS SISTER FROM HIS MOTHER) |
Same father | A man bore "A" and "B" from two different wives. The mother of "A" married (9) the (11) father of "1" & "2" and bore "3", and the mother of "B" married (9) the (11) father of "1" & "2" and bore "4". (1) |
| 11 | ACHOS IMO (HIS MOTHER'S SISTER) |
Same father *or* same mother |
A man (8) bore "A" and "B" from two different wives. The mother of "A" married (9) another man and bore a daughter, who bore "3" The mother of "B" married (9) another man and bore a daughter, who bore "4" from the same man who bore "3".(4) (11) |
| 12 | ACHOS ISHTO (HIS WIFE'S SISTER) |
Same father *or* same mother |
A man (8) bore "A" and "B" from two different wives. The mother of "A" married (9) another man and bore a daughter, who married "3" The mother of "B" married (9) another man and bore a daughter, who married "4" (4) (11) |
| 13 | ESHES ACHIV ME'IMO (THE WIFE OF HIS BROTHER FROM HIS MOTHER) |
Same parents (7) |
A man bore "3" and "4" from two different wives. The mother of "3" married (9) another man and bore "1", who married "A". The mother of "4" married (9) another man and bore "2", who married "B". (5) |
| 14 | ESHES ACHIV SHE'LO HAYAH BA'OLAMO (THE WIFE OF A BROTHER WHO DIED BEFORE HE WAS BORN) (acc. to R. Shimon) |
Same parents (10) |
"1"'s brother died childless, after which their brother, "3", was born. "1" then did Yibum with "A". (7) Another brother died childless, after which their brother, "4" was born. "2" then did Yibum with "B". (5) |
| 15 | KALASO (HIS) DAUGHTER-IN-LAW) |
Same parents (10) |
"A" and "B" were sisters. "A" first married the son of "3" and later (9) married "1". "B" first married the son of "4" and later (9) married "2". (5) |
==========
FOOTNOTES:
==========
(1) Even though the verse also says "Mitzvos," the Gemara does not say that "Mitzvos" is used here for a Gezeirah Shavah (as it is used in a number of the other categories). Rather, it teaches that the transgression of Avodah Zarah is as severe as all of the other Mitzvos (TOSFOS DH b'Akum, citing a SIFRI).
(2) This applies to a normal individual, a Nasi, and a Kohen Mashi'ach, for the verse says, "[Any] single soul...."
(3) This verse, "b'Yad Ramah v'Nichresa," is referring to a Megadef. According to the opinion of the Rabanan, a Megadef is an individual who serves Avodah Zarah, and this verse is a continuation of the discussion of an individual who served Avodah Zarah. (According to Rebbi, though, a Megadef is someone who blasphemes the name of G-d, and it has nothing to do with the discussion of an individual who serves Avodah Zarah. Therefore, "Vav Mosif" is necessary to show that the verse is referring to one who serves Avodah Zarah in a manner in which he is Chayav Kares -- TOSFOS DH Vayelamed)
(4) "A" married "1" and "B" married "2". When "1" and "2" die childless, "3" is able to do Yibum with "A" and "4" is able to do Yibum with "B".
(5) When "1" and "2" die childless, "3" is able to do Yibum with "A" (his Yevamah from "1"), and "4" is able to do Yibum with "B" (his Yevamah from "2").
(6) Rashi writes that "4", the second brother to have a daughter from this woman, also bore his daughter through rape. It is evident that the daughter of "3" must have been born through rape, and not through marriage, because if "3" had been married to the woman with whom he bore the child, then "4" would have been prohibited to the woman because of "Eshes Achiv" (the wife of his brother), as Rashi writes. However, that reason does not suffice to explain why the daughter of "4" also must have been born through rape, and not marriage. The TOSFOS HA'ROSH indeed quotes a version of Rashi in which Rashi writes that the second daughter was born through marriage. TOSFOS (DH Bito) and the Tosfos ha'Rosh, however, give a different reason why "4" could not have married the woman: had he married her, then both of the Yevamos would have been prohibited to "4" -- one because of "Bito" (she is his daughter) and the other because of "Bas Ishto" (she is the daughter of his wife). As for why Rashi did not mention this reason for setting up the case as one of Onsin (rape), rather than the reason of Eshes Achiv, as the ARUCH LA'NER asks, and Insights to 9b.)
(7) In all of the cases, the sequence of events makes no difference. Even if one event is listed before another in our description of the case, if it was physically possible for the latter event to have occurred first, the Halachic result will be the same. The only case in which the order makes a Halachic difference is the case of "Eshes Achiv she'Lo Hayah ba'Olamo," according to Rebbi Shimon, in which the order of events is essential to the case, as described by the Gemara (top of 10a).
(8) It does not have to be that one man bore the two of them from two different women. If one woman bore them from two different men, the result will be the same. The main point is that the two sisters share only one of their parents (i.e. they are half-sisters).
(9) After her previous husband died (or divorced her).
(10) This does not mean that they must have the same parents, but rather even if they have the same parents, the result will be the same.
(11) In the cases of Achos Imo (#11) and Achos Ishto (#12), Rashi "simplifies" the case by having the mothers of "A" and "B" bear "3" and "4", respectively, from the same man and not from different men (MAHARSHA). (In case #11, though, this necessitates having one of the mothers die before the father of "3" and "4" ("Yakov") can marry the second one, for otherwise the second one would be Achos Ishto.) Similarly, Rashi "simplifies" the case of Eshes Achiv me'Imo (#10) by having both "A" and "B" give birth to two of the four brothers (i.e. one gave birth to both "1" and "3", and the other gave birth to both "2" and "4"), thus requiring that Yakov marry only two wives and not four (MAHARSHA). (The Maharsha concludes that it is not clear why Rashi did not simplify the case of Achos Imo (#11) [and of Eshes Achiv me'Imo (#13) -- MK] in a similar fashion, by giving Yakov only two wives instead of three, see ARUCH LA'NER.)