Suggestion: Just like R. Shimon is unsure whether or not a Ma'amar acquires, so he is unsure whether or not a Get exempts [a Yevamah]!

Answer: We learn from the following. R. Shimon says that Bi'ah, when it is at the beginning, nothing takes effect after it. This implies that when it is at the end, something takes effect after it;

Bi'ah [at the end must refer to] after a Get, but Bi'ah after a Ma'amar, no matter what you will say, nothing takes effect after it!

If Ma'amar acquired (it is like Bi'ah), nothing takes effect after it!

If Ma'amar did not acquire, Bi'ah acquires, and nothing takes effect after it!

Conclusion: Rather, he discusses Bi'ah after a Get. This teaches that a Get exempts and leaves over.

Question: (In our Mishnah, R. Gamliel says that Ein Get after Get, and not Ma'amar after Ma'amar.) Does R. Gamliel hold like R. Shimon, that Ma'amar acquires [totally] or does not acquire [at all], and even more than R. Shimon [said, i.e. also] a Get exempts [totally], or does not exempt at all?

Answer: We learn from the following. R. Gamliel agrees to Chachamim that Yesh Get after Ma'amar, and Ma'amar after Get. Yesh Get after Bi'as Ma'amar (i.e. Bi'ah done after a Ma'amar), and Ma'amar after Bi'as ha'Get (Bi'ah done after a Get);

Question: What is the case of Get after Bi'as Ma'amar?

Answer: There were three Yevamos. He made a Ma'amar to this one, had Bi'ah with this one, and gave a Get to the third.

Inference: Ma'amar acquires and leaves over. If you would say that Ma'amar acquires [totally] or does not acquire [at all], no matter what you will say, [there is nothing after Bi'as Ma'amar]!

If Ma'amar acquires, there is nothing after it. If Ma'amar does not acquire, Bi'ah [after it] acquires, and there is nothing after it.

Conclusion: Ma'amar acquires and leaves over [unlike R. Shimon].

Question: What is the case of Ma'amar after Bi'as Get?

Answer: There were three Yevamos. He gave a Get to this one, had Bi'ah with this one, and gave a Ma'amar to the third.

Inference: Get exempts and leaves over. If you would say that Get exempts [totally] or does not exempt [at all], no matter what you will say, [there is nothing after Bi'as Get]!

If Get exempts, there is nothing after it. If Get does not exempt, Bi'ah [after it] exempts, and there is nothing after it.

Conclusion: Get exempts and leaves over.

Question: How can it be that R. Gamliel does not hold like R. Shimon, and [he holds that] Ein Ma'amar after Ma'amar, like R. Shimon?

Answer: His reason is unlike [the other's] reason. R. Gamliel holds that whatever the second Ma'amar would acquire later, the first Ma'amar already acquired. Whatever the second Get would acquire later, the first Get already acquired.

R. Shimon's reason is, if the first [Ma'amar] acquired, the second did not acquire. If the first did not acquire, also the second did not acquire (PNEI MOSHE);

If the first [Get] exempted, the second did not exempt. If the first did not exempt, also the second did not exempt. (HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA - really, we said above that R. Shimon holds that Yesh Get after Get! The Gemara means that if he held that Get exempts totally or not at all...)

Question: According to R. Gamliel, is there a Get after the Get of a Ma'amar? Is there a Ma'amar after the Get of a Ma'amar?

Question: What is the case of a Get after the Get of a Ma'amar?

Answer: There were two Yevamos. He gave a Ma'amar to this one, and gave to her a Get, and gave a Get to the second;

If you will say that a Get exempts more than Ma'amar acquired, [the first] is like one who has a Get, and Ein [there is no effect of a] Get after the Get of a Ma'amar;

If you will say that a Get does not exempt more than Ma'amar acquired, [the first] is like one who has no Get, and Yesh Get after the Get of a Ma'amar.

Question: What is the case of a Ma'amar after the Get of a Ma'amar?

Answer: There were two Yevamos. He gave a Ma'amar to this one, and gave to her a Get, and gave a Ma'amar to the second;

If you will say that a Get exempts all that Ma'amar acquired, [the first] is like one who has no Ma'amar, and Yesh Ma'amar after the Get of a Ma'amar;

If you will say that a Get does not exempt all that Ma'amar acquired, [the first] is like one who has a Ma'amar, and Ein Ma'amar after the Get of a Ma'amar.

Questions: According to R. Gamliel, is there Bi'ah Pesulah (it was forbidden) after Bi'ah Pesulah?

Is there Bi'ah of a Ben Tesha (a minor boy above nine years) after Bi'as Ben Tesha? (Chachamim made Bi'as Ben Tesha like a Ma'amar. Perhaps it is not totally like a Ma'amar.)

Is there Bi'ah Pesulah after Ma'amar? Is there Ma'amar after Bi'ah Pesulah?

Question: Do Chachamim agree to R. Gamliel that Ein Ma'amar after Ma'amar when there is one Yevamah [and one Yavam]?

Question: What is the case?

Answer: He gave a Ma'amar to his Yevamah, and gave to her a Get, and gave a [second] Ma'amar;

If you will say Yesh Ma'amar after Ma'amar, she is not exempted through Chalitzah without [another] Get [for the second Ma'amar]. If you will say Ein Ma'amar after Ma'amar, she is exempted through Chalitzah without [another] Get. (SHA'AREI TORAS ERETZ YISRAEL)

Question (R. Yudan): If one was Mekadesh a woman from now and after 30 days, and her sister fell to him [for Yibum] within 30 days [and he gave to her a Ma'amar] even so, Ein Ma'amar after Ma'amar? (R. Yochanan holds that Kidushin from now and after 30 days acquires and leaves over, like a Ma'amar. Do not say that in any case, after 30 days, the Kidushin is completed, and the Zikah and Ma'amar are uprooted. If the Ma'amar took effect, it does not go away without a Get!)

And what R. Avahu taught in the name of R. Yochanan [about Kidushin from now and after 30 days] that Kidushin of even 100 men can take effect in her (if each stipulated that his Kidushin finish before the previous one) is unlike R. Gamliel [who says that Ein Ma'amar after Ma'amar]?

Or, did R. Gamliel say [Ein Ma'amar after Ma'amar] only through a Get and through a Ma'amar? (When there is only Zikah, Get partially exempts. If so, Get applies to partial Zikah, and in what it leaves over, Ma'amar takes effect. [That remnant] is stronger than Kidushin from now and after 30 days, for there, without the Kidushin there is no Kinyan at all. Therefore, [all the more so] Ma'amar takes effect. We explained this based on OHR SOMAYACH Kuntres Zikah 13, SHA'AREI TORAS ERETZ YISRAEL.)