(Mishnah): How is this? If a Yavam gave a Ma'amar to his Yevamah and then a Get, she needs Chalitzah;

If he gave a Ma'amar then did Chalitzah, she needs a Get;

If he gave a Ma'amar and had Bi'ah, this is proper fulfillment of the Mitzvah.

(Gemara) Inference: A Get exempt more than a Ma'amar acquires.

If you would say that a Get does not exempt more than a Ma'amar acquires, he should [be able to] do Yibum!

Question: If he said "my Get should exempt only what my Ma'amar acquired" [what is the law]?

Answer: Even what his Ma'amar acquired, his Get did not exempt it. [A Get must be] "Kerisos" (totally severing), and this is not Kerisos [so he can do Yibum - SEFER NIR, CHESHEK SHLOMO].

A Pasul Chalitzah (e.g. after a Ma'amar; also a Get is needed, like our Mishnah teaches) exempts.

Question: For what does it exempt? (Also a Get is needed!)

Answer: If another came and was Mekadesh the Tzarah, Kidushin takes effect in her.

Question: [If he gave a Ma'amar then did Chalitzah, and before he gave a Get] another was Mekadesh her, [do we say that] since Zikah of the Mes was uprooted from her, Kidushin takes effect in her?

Or, since she needs a Get due to the Ma'amar, Kidushin does not take effect in her?

Answer (R. Ba bar Mamal): (Our Mishnah says that Ma'amar and Bi'ah is the proper Mitzvah.) This teaches that [also for a regular wife,] the Mitzvah is to be Mekadesh, and have Bi'ah afterwards;

If [for a Yevamah], about whom Kidushin is not written, you say 'this is its Mitzvah' (to be Mekadesh first), a [regular] wife, about whom Kidushin is written, all the more so!

(Mishnah): If he gave a Get and then a Ma'amar, she needs a Get and Chalitzah;

If he gave a Get and had Bi'ah, she needs a Get and Chalitzah;

If he gave a Get and did Chalitzah, nothing is needed after Chalitzah.

(Gemara): [In the Reisha] she needs a Get for his Ma'amar, and Chalitzah for his Zikah.

Inference: (The middle clause teaches that if he gave a Get and had Bi'ah, she needs a Get and Chalitzah.) This teaches that a Pasul Bi'ah does not exempt.

Question: How is this? (In Halachah 2 we learned that) Pasul Chalitzah exempts. Pasul Bi'ah does not exempt?!

Answer: Chalitzah, since its essence is Pasul (forbids Yibum, if it is Pasul - PNEI MOSHE), it exempts. Bi'ah, since its essence is not Pasul, does not exempt (if it is Pasul).

Question: [Granted, Pasul Bi'ah] should not exempt to be lenient, but it should exempt to be stringent!

Question: For what [stringency should it exempt]?

Answer: If a [stranger] came and was Mekadesh the Tzarah, Kidushin should take effect in her.

Answer (R. Yudan): I answered this - any Yevamah who is not totally outside (she is not permitted to a Zar), she is always inside (Kidushin does not take effect on her) until she goes out (through Chalitzah. MEICHAL HA'MAYIM - if Get is only mid'Rabanan, mid'Oraisa Bi'ah was proper Yibum, and Kidushin takes effect on the Tzarah! The Yerushalmi holds that Get is mid'Oraisa.)

(Mishnah): If he did Chalitzah, then gave a Ma'amar or a Get or had Bi'ah; or, if he had Bi'ah, then gave a Ma'amar or a Get or did Chalitzah, nothing takes effect after Chalitzah.

The same applies whether there is one Yevamah or two.

(Gemara): Even though they said that Ein Chalitzah after Chalitzah, Bi'ah after Chalitzah disqualifies to Kehunah.

Question: Without [the Bi'ah], is she not disqualified to Kehunah?!

Note: The Bavli holds that a Chalutzah is forbidden to a Kohen only mid'Rabanan. If so, we could have answered that the Bi'ah forbids her mid'Oraisa. Perhaps the Gemara preferred to show how it forbids to Terumah, which she was totally permitted until now. (PF) Or, perhaps the Yerushalmi holds that the Torah forbids a Chalutzah to a Kohen (HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA).

Answer #1: Rather, she is disqualified from eating Terumah [e.g. a Bas Kohen; had she not remarried him, she would have returned to eat Terumah of her father's house].

Objection: One who had Bi'ah with his Chalutzah, did he disqualify her from eating Terumah?! (Chayavei Lavim disqualify only when he is an "Ish Zar", i.e. from birth he was forbidden to her!)

Answer #2: Rather, if his brother had Bi'ah with her [he disqualified her from eating Terumah, for Kares forbids the Bi'ah].

Question: This is fine for the opinion that [the Choletz] is not Chayav [Kares] for the Chalutzah, but the brothers are Chayav [Kares] for the Chalutzah;

However, according to the opinion that both he and the brothers are not Chayav for the Chalutzah [how can we answer]?

Answer #3: Rather, he had Bi'ah with the Tzarah [Kares forbids the Bi'ah].

Question: This is fine for the opinion that all agree that he is liable for the Tzarah;

However, according to the opinion that he is not liable for the Chalutzah and not for the Tzarah [how can we answer]?

Answer #4: Rather, [one of] his brothers had Bi'ah with [the Tzarah].

Question: This is fine for the opinion that both [the Choletz] and the brothers are not Chayav for the Chalutzah, but they are Chayav for the Tzarah;

However, according to the opinion that both [the Choletz] and the brothers are not liable for the Chalutzah and not for the Tzarah [how can we answer]?

Defense of Answer #1: It is like R. Akiva, who says that Yesh Mamzer from a Chalutzah.

Answer #5 (R. Yosi): The case is, her Yavam is a Kohen. He had Bi'ah with her, and made her a Chalalah (for a Chalutzah is forbidden to Kehunah).

(Mishnah): If he gave a Get and did Chalitzah, nothing takes effect after Chalitzah.

Question: Was it not taught already (Mishnah 3) that nothing takes effect after Chalitzah?

Answer: Since it taught after this (our Mishnah) "whether there is one Yevamah or two" (it repeated that nothing takes effect after Chalitzah, i.e. even when there are two Yevamos).

Question: If one was Mekadesh his Chalutzah, does Kidushin not take effect in her?! (Ma'amar is Kidushin. Why does it not take effect after Chalitzah?)

Answer #1: We can say that it is like Rebbi [and the Ma'amar was given] Bal Korchah (against her will. He holds that Ma'amar acquires a Yevamah Bal Korchah, but all agree that Kidushin is only with her consent, like it says below - RIDVAZ.)

Answer #2: It is like everyone. He intended to acquire her due to Ma'amar in his Yevamah, and she is not his Yevamah (he did not intend for regular Kidushin).

Support (R. Ba - Beraisa): A Ma'amar acquires with Da'as (consent) or without Da'as. Rebbi says so;

Chachamim say, it acquires only with Da'as.

Rebbi agrees that Kidushin is only with Da'as.

Question: What is Rebbi's reason?

Answer: Bi'ah acquires, and Ma'amar acquires. Just like Bi'ah acquires with or without Da'as, also Ma'amar acquires with or without Da'as.

Question: Just like Rebbi says that Ma'amar acquires with or without Da'as, [does he say that] so Get exempts with or without Da'as?

Answer: Why does Rebbi say that Ma'amar acquires with or without Da'as? It is because Bi'ah of an adult acquires [a Yevamah] with or without Da'as;

Should a Get exempt without Da'as? Chalitzah exempts only with Da'as!