(Mishnah): Neither [husband] becomes Tamei for her.

Support: This is like R. Chiyah taught - he becomes Tamei for a Kosher wife, and he does not become Tamei for a Pasul wife.

Some teach that she leaves, and 13 fines apply. Some teach that she leaves, and 14 fines apply.

The one who says 13 fines, he counts her Metzi'ah and her earnings as one. The one who says 14, he counts each of them as one.

(R. Yirmeyah): If a Leviyah was Mezanah, she eats Ma'aser.

Support (Beraisa): If a Leviyah was captured or one of the Pesulim had Bi'ah with her, he cannot disqualify her;

Leviyim who are sullied from their mothers (their mothers are Chalalos, Chachamim) were not concerned for the scent of a Pesul.

Question (Mishnah): If she is a Bas Levi, she is disqualified from Ma'aser.

Answer (R. Yosi): The case is, a Yisrael had Bi'ah with her and she bore a son to him. (She is disqualified due to her son.)

(R. Bisna citing R. Yehoshua ben Levi): If a Kohenes was Mezanah, she eats Ma'aser.

Question: Does not our Mishnah teach this? A Bas Kohen is disqualified from Terumah. This implies that she eats Ma'aser.

Rejection: This is like the opinion that we do not give Ma'aser to Kehunah (i.e. Kohanim. In any case she does not eat Ma'aser.)

(R. Yosah): [The following] Rabanan's words argue [with R. Yehoshua ben Levi];

(R. Heila citing R. Shimon ben Yosina citing R. Hoshayah): If a Kohen had Bi'ah with a divorcee and fathered a son, and the father died within 30 days, [the son] must redeem himself. (If a disqualified Kohenes still has Kedushas Leviyah (for the Kohanim are Leviyim who received extra Kedushah), all the more so if a Kohen lost his extra Kedushah, he is still a Levi. Since the son must be redeemed, this shows that he does not have Kedushas Levi! We explained this like MEICHAL HA'MAYIM.)

[If he died] after 30 days, there is a Chazakah that the father redeemed him. (Even though the father keeps the money, he must separate five Sela'im for Pidyon. It is a Chidush that the father knows that he must redeem this son; he need not redeem Kosher children.)

If he redeems (receives the Pidyon of) others, all the more so [he redeems] his son!

Question: (Why was it taught that heirs of either husband do not inherit her Kesuvah?) Was it not taught already that she has no Kesuvah?!

Answer (R. Yosi ben Yakov): It is lest you say that they fined her, and they did not fine her heirs. Therefore it must say that they have no Kesuvah.

A Sotah - just like she is forbidden to the husband, she is forbidden to the Bo'el;

Just like she is forbidden to the husband's brother (she may not do Yibum), she is forbidden to the Bo'el's brother (if the Bo'el transgressed and married her, and he died).

Suggestion: Perhaps just like the Tzarah of a Sotah is forbidden to the husband's brother, so she is forbidden to the Bo'el's brother!

Answer #1: We learn from the following [Tosefta]. If a woman's husband went overseas, and they told her 'your husband died', and she had a Yavam here, and he did Yibum, and died, and afterwards her husband returned, he is forbidden to her and permitted to her Tzarah. He is forbidden to her and permitted to his brother's wife;

Is his brother's wife not like the Tzarah of a Sotah (the 'Yibum' was really Zenus)? This teaches that Tzaras Sotah is permitted to the Bo'el's brother.

Limitation (R. Yudah): [This Tosefta] is like Rabanan there (in Bavel);

(R. Heila): It was taught there teaches that all Arayos who married do not need a Get, except for Eshes Ish [who remarried according to a ruling of Beis Din];

R. Akiva says, even Achos Ishto and Eshes Achiv. (The first Tana does not require a Get for Eshes Achiv. This shows that one who mistakenly did Yibum is not considered a Sotah.)

Answer #2: However, according to Rabanan here [the Tzarah is forbidden];

(R. Achiya citing R. Yochanan): All agree that Eshes Achiv needs a Get, due to laws of Eshes Ish (the mistaken Yibum was also a case of Eshes Ish). He acquired her, and she is Ervah; Ervah exempts her Tzarah.

Rebuttal (Chananyah): [Answer #1] is even according to Rabanan here. [Just like we say that] they fined her, and they did not fine her heirs, [similarly they fined the Yevamah, and they did not fine her Tzarah. We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.]

(R. Chananyah brei d'R. Hillel): (The first Tana of the Tosefta is only like Rabanan here.) If it were like Rabanan there, [the Yavam] would be permitted even to her (the Yevamah, after her husband truly died)!

(R. Ze'ira citing R. Yochanan): Tzaras Sotah is forbidden, and Tzaras Gerushah (i.e. Tzaras Machzir Gerushaso after she remarried) is permitted.

(R. Yakov bar Acha citing R. Yochanan): All Tzaros are permitted, except for Tzaras Sotah.

(Shmuel): Gerushah (i.e. Machzir Gerushaso) herself is permitted to her house (the Yavam, even though she became forbidden to her husband).

Question: Does [R. Yochanan] argue [with Shmuel]?

Answer: (No.) Because they were discussing Tzaros, [R. Yochanan taught only about Tzaros; he] did not mention the law of] Gerushos (i.e. Machzir Gerushaso herself).

Question: Why is Tzaras Sotah forbidden?

Answer #1 (R. Yochanan): This is due to the scent of (she looks like) Ervah.

Answer #2 (Rav): It is because Tum'ah is written about her, like about Arayos (therefore her Tzarah is forbidden, just like Tzaras Ervah).