Question #1: In all of these attempted proofs, we need a reason what was the Havah Amina, after we already answered "does Shabbos help for Musafim (to be Mekadesh them), b not for Temidim?!" (Surely it helps also for Temidim!)

Question #1: And we must explain in Menachos (49a) regarding "Temidim are not Me'akev Musafim", there is a question like here of Tadir and Mekudash, and it is not resolved at all;

Here we do not bring the [attempted] proofs there, and those here it does not bring there!

Question: If so, it should teach Shelamim, and he slaughtered it before Chatas and Asham, and everything is on one day. Shelamim has precedence for Zerikah. Why does it discuss of yesterday?

Answer: Also of yesterday, perhaps it is like of yesterday (i.e. Shelamim was already slaughtered today, but Chatas was not), and everything is on one day, like it says above (75a) "what does it mean [they became mixed] while alive? [They became mixed after Shechitah in a way similar to becoming mixed while alive, i.e. the buckets of blood became mixed.] This is from R. Baruch.

Implied question: Rebbi and Rabanan argue in Menachos (62a) about Tenufah of Zivchei Shalmei Tzibur. They learn from Zivchei Shalmei Yachid, and Rav Papa said that all agree that Dun Minah u'Minah (all laws are learned from the source)!

Answer: That was before he heard the Beraisa here, that we conclude about one who brings a Nedavah of oil, that they argue about Dun Minah u'Minah.

Question: In a Mishnah in Menachos (104b), R. Tarfon says that just like we find that wine comes for Chovah and Nedavah, also oil, which comes for Chovah, comes for Nedavah;

Why does he need a Mah Matzinu, since we learn here from a verse [that one may bring a Nedavah of oil], since it says "Korban"?

Question: Why is he liable? Its Mitzvah was done!

Citation (above, 86a - Mishnah): Similarly, if a coal flew off the Mizbe'ach he does not return it!

Answer: Perhaps there is a difference between taking it down and when it flew off.

Implied question: The Mishnah in Tamid (33a) teaches "about a Kav of coals scattered from [the silver Machtah when he poured it into the gold pan. He sweeps them to the Amah."

Answer: This is fine even without this (saying that he is liable only when he overtly removed it from its Mitzvah), because it was uprooted [from the Mizbe'ach] for its Mitzvah, like it says in Yoma (46b).

Question: We know that R. Akiva holds like R. Shimon in Bava Kama (113a)! R. Shimon said in the name of R. Akiva that one may wear 10 garments of Sha'atnez, one on top of another, to evade [the tax]!

Answer: Two Tana'im argue about R. Akiva's opinion.