(Mishnah): If two potters were walking one after the other, and the first tripped and fell, and the second tripped on the first, the first pays the damages to the second.

If one was coming with (walking, and carrying) his barrel, and another is coming [towards him] with his beam, and the barrel broke upon [colliding with] the beam, he is exempt, for he has the right to walk and he has the right to walk.

(Gemara - R. Yochanan) Question: Do we give to the first time to stand [and he is liable only if he delayed the time to stand, and did not stand]?

Rebuttal (R. Yosi): It was obvious to R. Yochanan that we give to the first time to stand. It is unreasonable not to [according to Rabanan, who say that tripping is Ones]!

Question: [He asked] from the second [who tripped on the first] and onwards. Do we give to the second time to stand [and obligate him if he did not stand within the time? Or, do we attribute all the damage to the first? We explained this like MAHARA FULDA.]

Answer: We learn from the following [Tosefta]. If potters were walking one after the other, and the first tripped and fell, and another came and tripped on him and fell, and another tripped on [the second] and fell, the first pays the second, and the second pays the third. (This shows that the second can be liable, i.e. if he did not stand within the time);

If all fell due to the first, he pays all of them. And they are liable for damage to man, and exempt for damage to Kelim;

And if they warned each other, all of them are exempt.

If donkey-drivers were going one after the other, and the first tripped and fell, and another came and tripped on him and fell, and another tripped on [the second] and fell, the first pays the second, and the second pays the third;

If all fell due to the first, he pays all of them.

If donkeys were going one after the other, and the first tripped and fell, and another came and tripped on it and fell, even there are 100, all are liable;

Some teach that all are exempt.

(R. La): (They do not argue.) The one who says that all are liable, this is when their owners were there and left them lying down. [The one who exempts discusses] when they fell [and the owner could not stand it up before the next tripped on it]. There is no [obligation for] Ones regarding an animal (only man is liable for Ones).

(Beraisa): If the legs of one of them donkeys were weak (it goes slowly, the others) may not pass over it. If it fell, they may pass over it.

Question: What does it mean "they may pass over it''?

Answer: They trample on it and pass.

If one of them was empty, and one of them was laden [and the path is too narrow to go side by side], we detain the empty due to the laden (the laden goes first). If one was laden, and one was [partially] unloaded (SEDEI YEHOSHUA), we detain the unloaded due to the laden.

If both of them were laden, or both were unloaded, they compromise.

If there were two wagons or two boats, and one of them was laden and one of them was empty, we detain the empty due to the laden;

If both of them were laden, or both were unloaded, they compromise.

One who enters a bathhouse honors one who leaves (he lets him leave first, for he is weary). One who leaves a privy honors one who enters (he lets him enter first, lest the delay to relieve himself harm him - SEDEI YEHOSHUA).

(Mishnah): If one was coming with his barrel, and another is coming with his beam...

Question (R. Ze'ira): If both deviated (e.g. they were running) and damaged, what is the law?

Answer: We learn from the following [Beraisa]. If five sat on one bench, and another came and sat on it and it broke, he pays for all of them (if it was due to him, i.e. he is very heavy). If it broke due to all of them, all of them are liable. (Also in R. Zeira's question, it was due to both of them, so he pays his share - MAHARA FULDA.)