(Mishnah): If two witnesses testified that one stole, and slaughtered or sold, and they were Huzmu (found to be Zomemim, i.e. they were not present to see the testimony that they gave), they pay the full fine (four or five).

If two witnesses testified that he stole, and two others testified that he slaughtered or sold, and both pairs were Huzmu, the first pair pays Kefel for the animal, and the second pair pays the remaining (two or) three;

If only the second pair was Huzam, he pays Kefel, and the second pair pays (two or) three;

If only one witness was Huzam, if he is from the latter pair, the second testimony [about the Shechitah or sale] is void;

If he is from the first pair, the entire testimony is void. If he did not steal the animal, there is no [Isur] of Shechitah or a sale!

(Note: The Vilna print moved this Sugya to the end of the Perek, end of Vilna Daf 32a. The Oz v'Hadar print left it in place at the beginning of the Perek. We have presented it in both places.) [Our Mishnah says that when two sets witnesses were Huzmu, the witnesses of theft pay Kefel, and those of Shechitah pay three.] This is when witnesses of theft and of Shechitah came at once, but if witnesses of theft came, and they did not accept them (e.g. they did not know whose ox he stole), and afterwards witnesses of Shechitah came, and [Beis Din] said to them 'know that witnesses of theft came, and we did not accept them, and through you we accept them', if the witnesses of Shechitah were Huzmu, they pay through (i.e. also for) witnesses of theft.

R. Chizkiyah did not say so. Rather, [our Mishnah] is when witnesses of theft and of Shechitah came at once, but if witnesses of Shechitah came, and they did not accept them (perhaps he slaughtered his own animal), and afterwards witnesses of theft came, and [Beis Din] said to them 'know that witnesses of Shechitah came, and we did not accept them, and through you we accept them', and the witnesses of Shechitah were Huzmu, they pay through (i.e. also for) witnesses of Shechitah.

(Gemara - R. Ze'ira): (The Reisha does not distinguish between Hazamah about theft or Shechitah, like the Seifa does. In every case they pay four or five.) This teaches that an Ed Zomem is not disqualified in Beis Din [at the time of Hazamah], rather, he is disqualified by himself [from when he testified about what he was not present to see. (If he were disqualified only now, Hazamah about Shechitah would not disqualify testimony about theft.)

The case is, there was one warning (they testified at once about both the theft and the Shechitah or sale).