Clarification: The Gemara is querying Rabah who said earlier that a 'Milveh that is written in the Torah is not considered as if it is documented'; and that is how Rabeinu Tam corrected it in his Seifer.

Clarification (cont.): In fact, it could equally well have queried Rav Yosef, since he too, holds That 'Shibud is not d'Oraysa', only he (Rabah) is more explicit (See Shitah Mekubetzes 17).

Refuted Explanation: It is not on account of Rabah's Kashya that Rav gives this answer, seeing as Rabah lived many years after Rav ...

Authentic Explanation: But because the Gemara queries him from there in Perek Get Pashut (Bava Basra), where he says that 'One cannot claim an oral loan from the heirs' - so he is in fact, answering on his own behalf.

Implied Question: It is nevertheless necessary to say 'that he died and it buried him' ...

Answer: Since we would have thought that we need the owner of the ox to come and stand by his ox (Sanhedrin, Daf 19a) - so it teaches us that (since the Beis-Din was present) he did in fact, stand next to his ox.

Clarification: Since a Chatas and an Asham will not be brought after his death, whereas the Olah will (See Avodah Berurah).

Refuted Explanation: Before her Din has been concluded (Rashi).

Refutation: This is not correct however, seeing as it refers to 'Yotzei Lehareg', and every 'Yotzei Lehareg' is after the Din has been concluded ...

Source: As is implied in all the cases cites above in the cases connected with our Mishnah.

Proof: And so it is implied in Perek Kol ha'Get (Gitin, Daf 28b) which speaks about 'Going out to be judged' and 'Going out to be killed'.

Explanation #2: And the reason that 'Ein Mamtinim' in our Mishnah is - because of Inuy ha'Din (the prohibition of delaying carrying out the sentence [See Note at side]) ...

Proof: As is implied in Perek Echad Dinei Mamonos (Sanhedrin, Daf 35a) - that 'Inuy ha'Din' only applies after the G'mar-Din ...

Proof (cont.): When it says 'What should we do? Should we judge him on Erev Shabbos, conclude the judgment on Shabbos and execute him on Sunday? That would be entail delaying his Din ...

Proof (concl.): Should we conclude his Din on Sunday, they will forget their reasoning' - But we are not worried about Inuy ha'Din!

Clarification: Pachos mi'Sela is La'av Davka, because even if he gave the entire Erech except for one Sela, he is subsequently obligated to pay the full amount (See Shitah Mekubetzes).

Question: Why would we think to include Nidar, that makes it necessary to preclude him?

Answer: Since the Torah writes (in Vayikra 27) "ve'Chol Erk'cha Yih'yeh be'Shekel ha'Kodesh", implying that the Erech should not be less than a Shekel, and we also find an Erech of fifty Shekalim ...

Answer (cont): We would have concluded that Heseg Yad is a S'vara, and we therefore go after the Nidar (See Avodah Berurah) ...

Answer (concl): Therefore the Pasuk "asher Tasig Yad ha'Noder" teaches us that we do not go after the Nidar.

Question: Seeing as at the time that he made the first Neder, he had five Sela'im, how can he become Patur by giving one Sela? ...

Source: Since the Mishnah in Perek Heseg Yad (later on Daf 17b) states 'If he was an Ashir (at the time of the Neder) and he was poor when he came to the Kohen to pay, or if he was poor when he made the Neder, did not pay anything and became rich - he gives the Erech of a rich man' .

Answer: Citing Rabeinu, Tosfos explains that the Mishnah later is speaking specifically where the Kohen assessed him whilst he was still an Ashir, which is why, when he became an Ani, he still had to pay the Erech of an Ashir ...

Answer (cont.): But if he made the Neder when he was an Ashir, and he became poor before having been assessed, he gives the Erech of an Ani ...

Our Sugya: Here too, it speaks where he gave the four Sela'im for the second Neder, for which the Kohen assessed him first ...

Our Sugya (cont.): He then assessed him for the first Neder, for which the Noder paid him one Sela, which explains why he Patur from it - since he was not assessed on it whilst he still had the five Sela'im

Our Sugya (cont.): And he is Patur from it - because he was not assessed on it whilst he still had the five Sela'im.