TOSFOS DH HEIN U'MIGR'SHEIHEN L'MISTERINHU KAYMI
úåñ' ã"ä äï åîâøùéäï ìîéñúøéðäå ÷ééîé
(Summary: Tosfos reconciles this with the Beraisa earlier.)
åà"ú, îàé ðô÷à îéðä àí ðñúøå, ëéåï ùäéå îå÷ôåú çåîä îòé÷øà ...
Question: What difference does it make if they are demolished, seeing as they were initially walled ...
ãäà úðéà ìòéì "àùø ìå çåîä" ,åàò"ô ùàéï ìå òëùéå åäéä ìå ÷åãí ìëï?
Question (cont.): As the Beraisa stated earlier "asher Lo Chomah" even though it does not have a wall now, as long as it was walled beforehand?
åùîà é"ì ãàúéà ëøáé éùîòàì áø' éåñé ...
Answer #1: Perhaps it goes like Rebbi Yishmael b'Rebbi Yossi (who holds Kedushah Rishonah Kidshah l'Sha'ato, ve'Lo Kidshah le'Asid Lavo' ...
à"ð ùàðé äëà, ëéåï ùäí øàåéåú ùìà éäà ìäí çåîä, ìà úåòéì ìäí ÷ãåùú çåîä ùäéä ÷åãí ìëï, ëàéìå ìà äéúä îòåìí.
Answer #2: Or because it is different here, seeing as they are not supposed to have a wall, the Kedushah of the wall that was there beforehand will be of no avail, as if it never had one.
TOSFOS DH MI DAMI HASAM ZOCHEH
úåñ' ã"ä îé ãîé äúí æåëä
(Summary: Tosfos explains why the Gemara does not ask a similar question that it could have asked.)
åäëà ðîé äåé îöé ìîéôøê 'îé ãîé? äúí ëùäåà æåëä áùì àçøéí åäåé áîùîø ùìå ...
Implied Question: It could equally well have asked 'How can one compare them? there he acquires what belonged to others, but it is in his Mishmar ...
àáì äëà øöä ìæëåú îùîø àçø, åäéà àéðä îúçì÷ú ìëäðéí ùì îùîø àçø, ëãôé' ìòéì (ãó ëä.)? ...
Implied Question (cont.): Whereas here he wants to acquire in a Mishmar that is not his, and it cannott be divided among the Kohanim of another Mishmar, as Todfos explained earlier (on Daf 25a)?
àìà ãòãéôà îéðä ôøéê- ùàôéìå áàä îùîøúå, ëùéåöàä ìëäðéí àéï ìæëåú îäàé ÷ì åçåîø.
Answer: Only it asks even better - that even if he comes in his own Mishmar, when it goes out to the Kohanim, he cannot acquire it from the Kal va'Chomer.
TOSFOS DH AMAR RAMI BAR CHAMA ITZRICH ETC. ELA AMAR RAV NACHMAN ITZRICH, ETC.
úåñ' ã"ä àîø øîé áø çîà àéöèøéê ëå' [àìà] àîø øá ðçîï [àéöèøéê] ñ"ã ëå'
(Summary: Tosfos explains why the Gemara refers to a Kal v'Chomer.)
åàí úàîø, îàé äéà ãðàîø 'åãéï äåà' -åäìà àéï ìðå ìåîø ùæåëä áå îèòí ÷ì åçåîø àìà îèòí ãëúéáé ÷øàé ...
Question: What does the Gemara mean when it says 've'Din Hu' - seeing as we can only allow him to take it via the Kal v'Chomer based on the Pesukim ...
ã"àéù àú ÷ãùéå" ìøîé áø çîà, å"ìàçåæú òåìí" ìøá ðçîï?
Question (cont.): "Ish es Kodashav" according to Rami bar Chama and a'Achuzas Olam according to Rav Nachman.
åé"ì, ãîëì î÷åí ðéçà ìéä ìàéúåéé ÷ì åçåîø ëê îñáøà.
Answer: Nevertheless, the Gemara is happy to cite the Kal v'Chomer as it is from a S'vara (See Avodah Berurah).
TOSFOS DH HA KA MASHMA LAN ACHUZASO ACHUZASO IN CHERMO LO
úåñ' ã"ä äà ÷à îùîò ìï àçåæúå àçåæúå àéï çøîå ìà
(Summary: Tosfos reconciles this D'rashah with the Gemara earlier, which learned it from a Hekesh.)
åàí úàîø, äà ìòéì éìôéðï ìä îä÷éùà ãî÷éù ùãä çøîå ìùãä àçåæä ìéùøàì, åàîàé ãøéù ìéä äëà î"àçåæúå" ?
Question: Earlier, the Gemara learned it from a Hekesh, when it compared his Sadeh Cherem to a Sadeh Achuzah of a Yisrael, so why does it Darshen it here from "Achuzaso"?
åéù ìåîø, ãäëé ôéøåùå -÷à îùîò ìï îàçåæúå ùì ëäï ãàçåæúå ãå÷à éù ìä âàåìú òåìí åàéðä îúçì÷ú ìëäðéí áéåáì ...
Answer: What the Gemara means is - that the Achuzah of the Kohen teaches us that his Achuzah exclusively can always be redeemed, and is not divided among the Kohanim in the Yovel ...
àáì ùãä çøîå îúçì÷ ìëäðéí áéåáì, îäé÷ùà...
Answer (cont.): Whereas his Sadeh Cherem is divided among the Kohanim in the Yovel, based on the Hekesh ...
ãî÷ùéðï ìéä ìùãä àçåæä ùì éùøàì, åìà äåéà ëùãä àçåæúå ìéâàì ìòåìí.
Answer (concl.): Because we compare it to the Sadeh Achuzah of a Yisrael, in that it is not like his Sadeh Achuzah, which can always be redeemed.
åëï ôøù"é.
Support: And this is also how Rashi explains it.