(Beraisa): [The Shelamim] does not need bread or [Tenufah of the] Zero'a.

Question (R. Bun bar Chiyah brei d'R. Shimon): [A Nazir's] Shelamim is brought after death. Does it need bread?

Answer (R. Bun bar Chiyah): Also in his lifetime - does it not come l'Vatalah (not for Kaparah, e.g. he lost it, separated another and offered it, and then found the first), and you say that it needs bread? Also here, it needs bread!

Question (R. Yosah): It is clear to R. Bun bar Chiyah that Shelamim brought after Hafarah does not need bread (like our Mishnah says, but he did not settle his question from here). What is the difference between death and Hafarah? (We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)

Answer: [After] death, [the Korban] was already proper to [be offered and] require bread. [After] Hafarah, it was not proper to require bread.

(Beraisa): Asham [Nazir Tamei is brought] after Hafarah. [Asham] is not brought after death. If she died, her Asham is not offered. If he annulled her, her Asham is offered.

If she died, her Asham is not offered, for Asham is offered after death. If he annulled her, her Asham is offered, for you do not have an Asham offered l'Vatalah (e.g. after Kaparah) like this (this is the only case in which it is offered, even though it is not Mechaper - PNEI MOSHE).

(Mishnah): Mosar (excess money Hukdash for Korbanos of) Nezirim is for [Korbanos of other] Nezirim. Extra Mosar Nazir goes to Nedavah;

Opinion #1 (Rav Chisda): This is if he offered the Chatas at the end (so the extra money is Mosar Chatas, which goes to Nedavah), but if he offered the Shelamim at the end, the Mosar is [Mosar Shelamim, which is offered for] Shelamim.

Opinion #2 (R. Ze'ira): It is even if he offered the Shelamim at the end. It is one [uniform] Halachah (tradition from Sinai) about a Nazir, that the Mosar is Nedavah.

A Beraisa supports this one, and a Beraisa supports this one.

Support (for R. Ze'ira - Beraisa): These are Ma'os Stumim - any case in which Demei Chata'os ha'Mesos are mixed in. And even if [the owner had] separated the Demei Chatas from it, it is Ma'os Stumim.

Support (for Rav Chisda - Beraisa): [If one said] 'these [coins] are for my Chatas, and the rest are for [the rest of] my Nezirus', and he died, Me'ilah applies to (i.e. if one used) all of them, and Me'ilah does not apply to part of them;

Observation: [The Beraisa] did not say that if he died, they fall to Nedavah!

(Rav Chisda): Mosar of Lechem Nazir is left to rot.

Support (R. Yosi): This is proper! You cannot offer it by itself, for bread is not offered by itself;

You cannot offer it with another's [Korbanos] Nezirus, for there is no Nezirus without bread. (When the other accepted Nezirus, he already obligated himself to bring bread.)

Note: SHIREI KORBAN questions this, for there is no Nezirus without Korbanos, yet one can shave on another's Korbanos! Also, the bread becomes Kadosh only through Shechitah. Beforehand it can be redeemed!

Conclusion: Therefore, you must say that Mosar Lechem Nazir is left to rot.

Assumption: His Mosar Lechem and his Mosar Nechasim have the same law.

Rebuttal (R. Yosi bei R. Bun): His Mosar Nechasim are Kodshei Kodoshim. They go to Nedavah.

According to R. Yosi bei R. Bun, Shmuel, Rav Chisda and R. Elazar, the three of them said the same matter;

'Rav Chisda' refers to his teaching here (Mosar Nechasim go to Nedavah, for they are Kodshei Kodoshim);

'Shmuel' refers to what R. Yosi said - when I was there (in Bavel), I heard Rav Yehudah ask R. Shmuel, if one separated his [half-]Shekel (that every man gives every year for Korbanos Tzibur, which are Kodshei Kodoshim) and he died [what is the law]? Shmuel told him, it goes to Nedavah.

'R. Lazar' - Mosar Asiris ha'Eifah of a Kohen Gadol (his daily Minchah offering) - R. Yochanan says, it goes to Yam ha'Melach. R. Lazar says, it goes to Nedavah.