(Mishnah): If a woman forbade, to her father, father-in-law, brother or brother-in-law, what she will earn, her husband cannot annul the vow;

If she forbade her earnings to her husband, he need not annul (the vow is void anyway);

R. Akiva says, he should annul it, lest she earn more than is proper (required) for him [to receive];

R. Yochanan ben Nuri says, he should annul it, lest he divorce her, and she will be forbidden to return to him.

(Gemara - Mishnah): One who was Makdish his wife's earnings, she works and eats;

The excess - R. Meir says, it is Hekdesh. R. Yochanan ha'Sandlar says, it is Chulin.

(Reish Lakish): They argue about [a wife who spins] more than five Sela'im (her quota).

[Reish Lakish] explains that he feeds her, but does not give to her Ma'ah Kesef (a sixth of a Dinar each week) for her needs.

Support (Mishnah): If he does not give to her Ma'ah Kesef for her needs, her earnings are hers. (This is like R. Meir, who holds that [he receives] her [basic] earnings in exchange for Ma'ah Kesef, and her excess earnings in exchange for feeding her. R. Yochanan ha'Sandlar says that he gets basic earnings for feeding her and for Ma'ah Kesef, and her excess earnings are always hers.)

(R. Yochanan): They argue about her excess after death.

[R. Yochanan] explains that he does not feed her (therefore he has no rights to her earnings in her lifetime), but if he feeds her, all agree that it became Hekdesh.

(Our Mishnah discusses when he feeds her.) R. Meir holds that [all her earnings are his, so] he need not annul, like the first Tana. R. Yochanan ha'Sandlar holds that [her excess earnings] are hers, [just like] R. Akiva holds that [they are] hers (therefore, he annuls due to excess earnings). R. Yochanan ben Nuri holds that [even her excess earnings] are his (therefore, he annuls only due to after divorce).

(Mishnah - R. Akiva): He annuls.

(R. Ba): When she forbade her earnings - he can force her to produce only until five Sela'im. From here and above he cannot force her (so her vow takes effect), and he fears lest he benefit from Isur, therefore R. Akiva says that he annuls [even though her basic earnings are] his.

Question (R. Heila): It is possible for her to produce exactly five Sela'im! Until five Sela'im he forces her; from here and above he cannot force her! Why must he annul?)

Answer: He fears lest she produce Mashehu (any amount) extra, and it turns out he benefits from Isur. Therefore [R. Akiva says that] he annuls his. (We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)

Note: There is an implied question. R. Yochanan ben Nuri says, he annuls, lest he divorce her and cannot remarry her. Since this applies only after divorce, it is not between him and her! Why can he annul?

Answer (R. Heila): R. Yochanan ben Nuri's reason is, since she knows that if he divorces her, it is forbidden for her to return to him, she even provokes him, and he does not divorce her. (Therefore, this is between him and her; he annuls, and she fears to provoke him, lest he divorce her.)