If he made a pile and bowed before it (as idol-worship) and then smoothed it (thereby making it obligated in Terumah) and ate it -

If he was warned against eating it since it was tevel, he does not receive lashes.

If he was warned because of the prohibition of benefitting from idol-worship, he receives lashes. A stringent prohibition can take effect upon a lighter prohibition but not vice-versa.

But if he first smoothed it and then bowed before it -

If he was warned against eating it since it was tevel, he receives lashes.

If he was warned because of the prohibition of benefitting from idol-worship, he receives lashes. A stringent prohibition can take effect upon a lighter prohibition but not vice-versa.

Query (R' Bun bar Chiya): If one ate Chametz of Terumah on Pesach, to whom does he pay?

Answer: It is a dispute between R' Yochanan and R' Shimon ben Lakish, who disagreed about a person who stole Terumah from his mother's father who was a Kohen - R' Yochanan said he must pay one of the tribe; R'SBL said that he pays himself (meaning that he separates chulin to the equivalent value of the Terumah and chomesh that he owes; it now becomes Terumah and he can then sell it to a Kohen and keep the money. This disagreement also applies to a person who ate Chametz of Terumah.)

(R' Mana to R' Yosa): It is logical to say that R''SBL would agree to R' Yochanan that chomesh is paid to the tribe.

(R'Yosa): I agree, just as the ashes of Tamei Terumah go to the tribe.

Rejection (R' Yosa bar R' Bun quoting R' Acha): They even disagree there.