If he burned and extinguished in one blowing, he is liable twice.

Inference (R. Avdimi the brother of R. Yosi): This shows that [blowing is a proper action, so] if one blew on Kelim and broke them, he pays full damage.

If one scooped coals from under a pot on Shabbos, he is liable.

(R. Shimon ben Elazar citing R. Lazar bei R. Tzadok): He is liable twice - once because he extinguished the top [coals], and once because he made the bottom ones burn. (The first Tana exempts for burning, for he holds that burning is only a Lav.)

If one scooped coals [and they flared up] and he warmed himself opposite them on Shabbos, he is exempt.

(R. Yakov bar Acha): There is an argument about this. This is like the opinion [above] that he is liable only once. However, according to the opinion that he is liable twice (R. Lazar bei R. Tzadok, who obligates for burning), he is liable.

(R. Avahu citing R. Yochanan): [If one scooped coals from under a pot,] he is not truly] liable twice, just it is considered as if he is liable twice (e.g. to be buried among people who did two Aveiros).

Note: It seems that this belongs above, right after R. Shimon ben Elazar's teaching that he is liable twice.

(R. Yudan): [All exempt when he warms himself, for] there, he does not want them to flare up, and he does not want them to extinguish. However, here (scooping under a pot), he wants [those on bottom] to flare up, and he wants [those on top] to extinguish! (We explained this like HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA.)

If one burned [a food] and cooked [it] - some teach that he is liable twice, and some teach that he is liable once. (At the end of this Halachah we equate this to burning Korbanos on the Mizbe'ach - SEFER NIR.)

The one who says that he is liable twice, one is for burning and one is for cooking.

Question: The one who says that he is liable once, for which is he liable?

Answer #1 (R. Yudah): He is liable for burning.

Answer #2 (R. Yosi): He is liable for cooking. (PNEI MEIR - R. Yudah and R. Yosi here are Amora'im.)

Question (against R. Yosi): Burning teaches about all the Melachos in the Torah. He is not lashed for burning, rather, for cooking?!

Note: We could answer that R. Yosi holds like the opinion that burning is only a Lav, and he learns liability for each Melachah from "Achas''!

(R. Chiyah Rabah): If a Zar (non-Kohen) served in the Mikdash on Shabbos, or a [Kohen] Ba'al Mum served b'Tum'ah, [it is considered that he transgressed] two Aveiros;

(Bar Kapara): [It is considered that he transgressed] one.

Question (Bar Kapara, to R. Chiyah Rabah): Avodah that a Kohen is permitted to do, is a Zar liable for it [for Shabbos?! The Torah permitted this on Shabbos! He is liable for Zarus!]

Answer #1 (R. Chiyah Rabah): [This is like we find regarding] Kemitzah. Before Kemitzah [a Minchah] is forbidden to this [Kohanim] and this [Zarim]. After Kemitzah, [the Shirayim] are forbidden to Zarim and permitted to Kohanim. (Also Avodah on Shabbos was forbidden to all. It was permitted only to Kohanim, but not to Zarim.)

Rebuttal (Bar Kapara): [Menachos] are different. It says "v'Chol Zar Lo Yochal Kodesh.'' (The Torah explicitly forbade Zarim. It did not explicitly forbid Zarim to serve on Shabbos.)

Answer #2 (R. Chiyah Rabah): [This is like we find regarding] Melikah. Before Melikah, [Chatas ha'Of] is forbidden to this and this. After Melikah it is forbidden to Zarim and permitted to Kohanim!

Rebuttal (Bar Kapara): [Chatas ha'Of] is different. It says "v'Chol Zar Lo Yochal Kodesh.''

Answer #3 (R. Chiyah Rabah): [This is like we find regarding] Tevel. Before fixing (tithing) it, it is forbidden to this and this. After fixing it, [the Terumos] are forbidden to Zarim and permitted to Kohanim!

Rebuttal (Bar Kapara): [Terumah] is different. It says "v'Chol Zar Lo Yochal Kodesh.''

They said, let us go out [to the Beis Midrash] and learn [from what they teach there]. They went out and heard that R. Yosi obligates twice, and R. Shimon obligates once;

Question: [Granted,] the one who says once, it is due to Zarus. The one who says twice - one is for Zarus. What is the other [liability for]?

Answer #1: It is due to Shechitah.

Objection: Shechitah of a Zar is Kosher!

Answer #2: Rather, it is due to Holachah, Zerikah or Kabalah.

Objection: These are forbidden [on Shabbos] only mid'Rabanan!

Answer #3: It is due to consumption of limbs and Chelev. They are [burned] on the Mizbe'ach the entire night.

Note: Why must we discuss at night? Based on (but not totally like) NO'AM YERUSHALMI, we can say that R. Yosi obligates twice only when the Isurim came together, e.g. a Korban offered on Erev Shabbos. A Korban offered on Shabbos, the Isur Shabbos preceded the Isur for a Zar to burn the Eimurim.

Question: According to R. Yehudah, who said [above that one who cooked and burned is] liable for burning, this is fine. However, according to R. Yosi, who said that he is liable for cooking, what cooking is there here? (It is Melachah she'Einah Tzerichah l'Gufah, for no one will eat it!)

Answer: Since he wants them to be consumed, it is as if he cooks.