(Daniel brei d'R. Katina, citing Rav Asi): The spines of Lulav branches are like Gefes and wood [if they heated the oven, it must be Garuf v'Katum].

Limitation: This is when they were wet and dried, but if they were dry from the beginning, they are like straw and stubble.

Animal dung - some say it is like Gefes and wood, and some say that it is like straw and stubble.

(They do not argue.) The one who says like Gefes and wood discusses [dung of] a small animal (not used for work), and the one who says like Gefes and wood discusses a big animal.

Question: One who sweeps - must he sweep totally?

Answer: It was taught that one who sweeps must sweep with his hand [to ensure that no coals remain]. This shows that he must sweep totally.

Question: One who puts ashes - must he totally cover with ashes?

Answer: It was taught that one burns (through spreading) on [the coals] flax stubble (the ashes will partially cover the coals). This teaches that he need not totally cover with ashes.

Question: Where was this taught?

Answer: If Yom Tov fell on Erev Shabbos (one may not sweep or cover the coals with ashes, due to extinguishing), R. Shein said that he burns on [the coals] flax stubble.

Note: Why are more concerned for extinguishing than for burning? The Yerushalmi (Beitzah 5:2) expounds "Lo Seva'aru Esh... b'Yom ha'Shabbos'', but you may burn on Yom Tov.

Question: If he put on ashes and the coals flared up [on Shabbos], what is the law [of a Tavshil left on them]?

Answer: [Such a case occurred, and] R. Chiyah Rabah entered his house and ruled that it is permitted.

Question (to R. Ze'ira, R. Hoshayah and R. Chananyah, the colleague of Rabanan): [Does R. Chiyah permit Shehiyah] l'Chatchilah (if they flared up before Shabbos, or only) b'Di'eved?

R. Ami passed by, and the Talmidim separated and pursued to ask this to him.

R. Chananyah, the colleague of Rabanan (to the Talmidim): [You need not ask this from R. Ami. Surely R. Chiyah permits l'Chatchilah; he permitted b'Di'eved,] for that was the case that arose.

(R. Shmuel bar Susartei): (It was obvious that b'Di'eved it is permitted.) The question was only l'Chatchilah [and R. Chiyah permitted].

Question (R. Mana, to R. Ba brei d'Rav Papi): How can you say that [perhaps] it is permitted only b'Di'eved? Even if he cooked on it l'Chatchilah [on Shabbos b'Shogeg, without covering with ashes it is permitted! We explained this like PNEI MEIR. R. Ila answers this at the end of this Amud.]

(Beraisa): If one tithed or cooked on Shabbos b'Shogeg, he may eat it. If he was Mezid, he may not eat it [on Shabbos]. R. Meir says so;

R. Yehudah says, if he was Shogeg, he may eat it on Motza'ei Shabbos. If he was Mezid, he may never eat it;

R. Yochanan ha'Sandlar says, if he was Shogeg, others may eat it on Motza'ei Shabbos, but he may not. If he was Mezid, it is never permitted to him or to others.

Shmuel ruled like R. Yochanan ha'Sandlar.

When Rav ruled in the Beis Midrash, he said [leniently] like R. Meir. When he ruled in public [amidst Amei ha'Aretz], he ruled like R. Yochanan ha'Sandlar.

(R. Shimon bar Karsenah): [Rav] expounded to us like R. Yishmael bei Rebbi Yosi;

(Beraisa - R. Yishmael bei Rebbi Yosi citing his father): Anything for which b'Mezid one is Chayav Kares and b'Shogeg he is Chayav Chatas, if he did it on Shabbos, whether Shogeg or Mezid, it is forbidden both to him and to others;

Anything for which one is not Chayav Kares b'Mezid and Chayav Chatas b'Shogeg, if he did it on Shabbos b'Shogeg, others may eat it on Motza'ei Shabbos, but he may not. If he was Mezid, it is not permitted to him or to others.

Question (to R. Yochanan): What do you say?

Answer (R. Yochanan): I follow only a [Stam] Mishnah - if one tithed or cooked on Shabbos b'Shogeg, he may eat it. If he was Mezid, he may not eat it.

Objection: Rav Chisda heard this, and said "Shabbos was permitted!'' (People will transgress b'Mezid, and say that they were Shogeg!)

Didn't Rav Huna teach in the name of Rav, and also R. Chiya taught so - initially they said that one who forgot [and left b'Isur] a Tavshil on a Kirah, and Shabbos came, if he was Shogeg, he may eat it. If he was Mezid, he may not eat it;

People were suspected to leave b'Mezid and say "we forgot'', so they forbade one who forgot.

Here, do you say so [that b'Shogeg he is permitted]?!

Answer (R. Ila): They were suspected to leave (be Meshaheh). They were not suspected to cook on Shabbos]. They fined one who was Meshaheh, and they did not fine one who cooked;

Note: This answers also R. Mana's question above. Even if b'Di'eved we permit one who cooked on Shabbos, we forbade one who did Shehiyah. R. Chiyah needed to permit Shehiyah when ashes were put and it flared up.

They returned to say that a Tavshil that is Mitztamek v'Yafeh Lo is forbidden, and a Tavshil that is Mitztamek v'Ra Lo is permitted.