R. Yochanan went to a place, and said 'I am Ben Azai of here' (I am ready to answer any question).

Question (an elder - Mishnah): Gidulei Terumah are Terumah; Gidulei Giduleihem (what grows from Gidulim) is Chulin. However, Tevel, Ma'aser Rishon, Sefichei (what grows by itself in) Shemitah, Terumah of Chutz la'Aretz, Meduma and Bikurim, their Gidulim are Chulin;

There you say that Gidulei [Ma'aser and Bikurim] are permitted, and here (our Mishnah) forbids Gidulim!

Answer (R. Yochanan): Gidulim are permitted in a matter in which the seed perishes. Gidulim are forbidden in a matter in which the seed does not perish (e.g. an onion just gets bigger).

Question (the elder): A Mishnah teaches, what is a matter in which the seed does not perish? It is species like Luf (a kind of onion), garlic, and onions. Are Luf, garlic, and onions obligated in Bikurim?!

R. Yochanan: Ben Azai of here left (I cannot answer any question like he can). He went and asked R. Yanai.

Answer #1 (R. Yanai): Regarding Ma'aser it was taught that if the seed does not perish [Gidulim are forbidden].

Objection: R. Yochanan contradicts himself! There, [a Mishnah taught that one who carries or moves a Neveilah or Mei Chatas is Metamei Begadim, but there is no Tum'as Begadim for touching. How can one touch Mei Chatas without moving them?] R. Yehoshua ben Levi said, this was taught about touching the horn of a Neveilah (indeed, it cannot apply to Mei Chatas);

Objection (R. Yochanan): Did Rebbi not teach [in the Mishnah] 'v'Chashuchei Begadim' (plural? If so, you cannot say that it applies only to Neveilah.) Also here, Giduleihem (is plural. Why did R. Yochanan accept R. Yanai's answer that it applies only to Ma'aser?)

Answer #2 (R. Heila): You say that Gidulim are forbidden according to Rabanan. You say that Gidulim are permitted according to R. Shimon.

Objection (Mishnah): Gidulim of Hekdesh and Ma'aser Sheni are Chulin, and he redeems them [based on the value of the seeds] at the time he planted them.

Why does he redeem them? Is it not due to the Kedushah in them? Also here, they should require a Mechitzah, due to the Kedushah in them!

Answer #3 (R. Yirmeyah citing R: Imi citing Reish Lakish): You say that Gidulim are forbidden - Isur Mechitzah (outside of Yerushalayim). You say that Gidulim are permitted - to Zarim.

(Mishnah): These apply to Ma'aser and Bikurim, but not to Terumah.

(Mishnah): "V'Gam Nesativ'' - this is Terumah and Terumas Ma'aser.

Question: There you say that Terumah requires Viduy, and here you say that Terumah does not require Viduy!

Answer #1 (R. Heila): There it discusses the giver, and here it discusses the receiver;

(Beraisa): Ma'aser and Bikurim - both the giver and the receiver are obligated in Viduy. Terumah, the giver is obligated in Viduy, but the receiver is not obligated in Viduy.

Answer #2 (R. Ze'ira): Rabanan there hold like [R. Heila]. Rabanan here (in Eretz Yisrael) say, one who has Ma'aser alone, he says Viduy; Bikurim alone, he says Viduy. One who has Terumah alone, he does not say Viduy. (We explained this like SHA'AREI TORAS ERETZ YISRAEL.)

Support (R. Yosi (the Amora) - Mishnah): (R. Meir says, Kohanim and Leviyim do not say Viduy.) R. Yosi (the Tana) says, [they say Viduy, for] they have refuge cities (and can grow things);

Question: What do we discuss [saying Viduy for it]?

If it is Terumah and Ma'aser [Rishon, this cannot be, for] they are his! (Bi'ur does not apply, for a Kohen may keep his Terumah and Ma'aser Rishon forever!)

Answer: Rather, we discuss Ma'aser Sheni and Bikurim. (Even a Kohen must give Bikurim to another Kohen, and both of them must be eradicated at the time of Bi'ur.)

Rebuttal (R. Heila): Do we learn [from here] that one who has Ma'aser alone, he says Viduy, and that one who has Bikurim alone, he says Viduy? (Perhaps it is only if he has both of them!) Do we learn [from here] that one who has Terumah alone, he does not say Viduy?! (Perhaps a Yisrael says for Terumah alone! We explained this like GRA.)