(Beraisa): "V'Livnei Aharon Ta'aseh Kutanos'' - Rabanan say, two Kutanos for every one;

R. Yosi says, even one Kesones for every one.

What is Rabanan's reason? "V'Livnei Aharon Ta'aseh Kutanos.'' What is R. Yosi's reason? For 100 Bnei Aharon you will make (100) Kutanos (one each).

"Vad'' - they must be new (like when they were flax stalks).

Question: If you will say that they cannot wear tattered garments, it says "u'Levesham'' - even tattered garments!

Answer: Rather, [Vad] teaches that it must be woven l'Shem Kodesh.

Support (Beraisa): Kodesh stones (i.e. for the Mizbe'ach) must be quarried l'Shem Kodesh, and a person did not use them. Bigdei Kodesh must be woven l'Shem Kodesh, and a person did not use them.

(R. Chananyah citing R. Yosa): [Tana'im] argue about this. [A Beraisa teaches that] if hide was tanned for the sake of a Kemi'a (amulet), one may write a Mezuzah on it. R. Shimon ben Gamliel forbids.

(R. Yosah): We wanted to say that they argue about [something for a] person, but not for Kodshim (all require Lishmah for Kodshim);

Retraction: However, a Beraisa taught that Kodesh stones must be quarried l'Shem Kodesh, and a person did not use them. Bigdei Kodesh must be woven l'Shem Kodesh, and a person did not use them, and R. Chananyah said in the name of R. Yosa that [Tana'im] argue about this. This shows that they argue even for the sake of Kodesh.

Source (Beraisa #1): One who makes a Kli for Kodesh - until Kodesh used it, a person may use it. From when Kodesh used it, a person may not use it.

Contradiction (Beraisa #2): One who makes a Kli for Kodesh, a person may not use it.

Resolution #1 (R. Chananyah citing R. Yosa): They argue like the following Tana'im;

(Beraisa #3): One who makes a Kli for a person - until a person used it, one may use it for Kodesh. From when a person used it, one may not use it for Kodesh.

Contradiction (Beraisa #4): One who makes a Kli for a person, one may not use it for Kodesh.

Resolution #2 (Rav Chunah citing Rabanan of Bavel): The case [in Beraisa #2] is, it comes from Terumas ha'Lishkah. You cannot learn anything from it.

Question: When do Klei Shares become Kadosh - immediately, or at the time of [the first] use?

If you will say that it is immediately, it is fine. If you will say that it is at the time of use, do they become Kadosh and be Mekadesh (their contents) at once?!

Question: It is fine [the Klei Shares in the days] of Moshe - they became Kadosh through Shemen ha'Mishchah. However, those of Shlomo (for Bayis Rishon) did they become Kadosh and be Mekadesh at once?!

Answer: When they entered the land (really, when they built the Beis ha'Mikdash), they transferred [Kodshim] from Moshe's Kelim into Shlomo's [to be Mekadesh the Kelim].

Question: If they did not have Kelim of Moshe (e.g. when the exiles returned from Bavel at the beginning of Bayis Sheni), did they become Kadosh and be Mekadesh at once?!

Answer: When they ascended from exile, they transferred from Shlomo's Kelim into theirs.

Question: If they did not have Kelim of Shlomo, did they become Kadosh and be Mekadesh at once?!

Rocks that were quarried for the sake of a Mes are Asur b'Hana'ah. [If they were quarried] for the sake of a live person [after he will die] and a Mes, one may benefit from them.

If one throws a Kli in front of a Mes' bier - if [it landed] within four Amos of it, it is Asur b'Hana'ah. Outside of four Amos, one may benefit from it.

You find that he immerses five times and is Mekadesh 10 times in the day. What is the source that he was Mekadesh his hands and feet twice for each Tevilah? It says "u'Fashat... v'Rachatz... v'Lavash.'' (V'Rachatz teaches about Kidush. It is put between u'Fashat and v'Lavash to teach that there is Kidush for each.)

(R. Elazar b'Ribi Shimon): There is a Kal v'Chomer! Where Tevilah is not required (mid'Oraisa, i.e. to serve the rest of the year), Kidush is required. Here that Tevilah is required, all the more so Kidush of hands and feet is required!

Rebuttal: Take back what you brought (it is not a proper source)! There, [he is Mekadesh] only once the entire day. Also here [you may learn only] once the entire day!

Question: It says "u'Fashat Es Bigdei ha'Bad'' - why did it need to say "Asher Lavash''? Would it cross our minds that he removes something that he did not wear?! If so, why does it say "Asher Lavash''?

Answer #1: This equates removing to donning. Just like donning is with Kidush of hands and feet, also removing is with Kidush of hands and feet.

Answer #2 (R. Mana): It is more reasonable to say oppositely! This equates donning to removing. Just like removing is with Kidush of hands and feet, also donning is with Kidush of hands and feet.

Question: (R. Meir says that in the morning he wore Pilusin worth 12 Maneh, and in the afternoon he wore Indian garments worth eight Maneh). Are not second rate Pilusin better than first rate Indian?!

Answer: From there [we find that] a word (it is called the best of its kind) is worth money. (Pilusin worth eight are better than Indian worth eight. The attribute of the latter is that they are the best of their kind.)

Question (Mishnah): The first [oil that comes from] the first [olives at the top of the tree], no [oil] is better than it. The second [oil from] the first, and the first from the second, they are equal.

Isn't the second from the first better than the first from the second?! (Why does it say that they are equal?)

Answer: From there [we find that] a word is worth money. (Indeed, the second from the first is better. The Mishnah calls them equal, for the first from the second has the attribute of being the best of its kind.)

Question: What is the reason (why the afternoon garments are inferior to the morning garments)?

Answer (R. Nachman citing R. Mana): Regarding the morning [garments] it says "Vad'', "Vad'' four times [to teach that they are the highest quality]. Regarding the afternoon [garments] it says "Vad'' [only once].

A case occurred in which R. Yishmael ben Pi'avi wore Kusanos worth 100 Maneh and ascended and offered on the Mizbe'ach. (The Kohen Gadol may add his money to buy nicer garments.)

A case occurred in which R. Eliezer ben Charsum wore a Kesones worth 20,000 [Maneh] and ascended and offered on the Mizbe'ach, and his brethren Kohanim made him come down, for he appeared naked through it.

What did he do? He filled it with water and surrounded the Mizbe'ach seven times. (ALEI TAMAR - he showed that it is despised to him, like a water pouch. He surrounded the Mizbe'ach for Teshuvah for having served in such a garment.)

Note: The Sugya was discussing the Bigdei Lavan. Also, he would not appear naked while serving in the eight Begadim, for the Me'il covered the Kesones! However, in the Bigdei Lavan he does not ascend on the Mizbe'ach to offer; he merely takes coals from the Mizbe'ach for the Ketores! If indeed this was on Yom Kipur, he must hold that wetting a clean garment is not considered laundering. He did not forbid lest he come to squeeze, for he did not care if the Kesones was wet (like Mishnah Berurah 302:47), for he no longer considered it a garment.