YOM TOV BEFORE OR AFTER SHABBOS (Yerushalmi Demai Perek 4 Halachah 1 Daf 17a)
[ãó ìã òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] é"è ùäåà ñîåê ìùáú áéï îìôðéä áéï îìàçøéä åëï ùðé éîéí èåáéí ùì âìéåú î"ã ÷ãåùä àçú äéà àåëì î"ã ùúé ÷ãåùåú äï àéðå àåëì
When Yom Tov occurs close to Shabbos, whether before or after; and similarly two days of Yom Tov in Chutz LaAretz - according to the opinion that the two days are considered one long day, if he asked on the first day, he may eat on the second day; according to the opinion that they are considered two separate days, he may not eat.
àôéìå ìî"ã ùúé ÷ãåùåú äï àåëì òã ùìà ðøàä ìòùø îòùø áðúééí åúðéðï ùåàìå áé"è àåëì áùáú áùáú àåëì áé"è
Rebuttal: Even according to that second opinion, he may still eat - the reason that the Mishnah taught that he may no longer eat after Shabbos is because he is able to tithe - but since in these cases he's not permitted to tithe, he may continue to eat. And we have a Baraisa that taught - if he asked him on Yom Tov, he may also eat on Shabbos; if he asked him on Shabbos, he may also eat on Yom Tov.
ø' éåðä áùí ø' æòéøà úéôúø áôéøåú ùðñîëä ãòúå òìéäï îòøá ùáú àáì áôéøåú ùìà ðñîëä ãòúå òìéäï îòøá ùáú ìà áãà
(R. Yona citing R. Zeira): It refers to fruits that he had in mind before Shabbos, but for fruits that he had not, they didn't allow it.
àîø øáé îðà îéìéäåï ãøáðï îñééòéï ìøáé éåðä àáà ãúðéðï úîï äîãéø àú çáéøå ùéàëì àöìå åäåà àéðå îàîéðå òì äîòùø
(R. Mana): The words of the Chachamim support my father R. Yona - as it taught in the next Mishnah - One who imposed a vow on his friend to eat with him, but the friend does not trust him concerning separating Maaser [he may only eat with him for one Shabbos and only if the host told him that the fruits are tithed].
øáé éðàé áùí øáé éùîòàì áùí øáé éåçðï áùáú ùì ôøåèâîééà äúéøå îôðé àéáä áùáú ùì ôøåèâîééà ìà áôéøåú ùðñîëä ãòúå òìéäï îòøá ùáú äéà åìà àîø àìà îôðé àéáä:
(R. Yannai citing R. Yishmael citing R. Yochanan): When they permitted the first Shabbos, it was referring to Shabbos Sheva Berachos (the first Shabbos of their marriage) - and they permitted it to avoid animosity (that might be caused if one party wouldn't eat the food of the other party). He did not have the fruits in mind before Shabbos, but they nevertheless permitted them to avoid animosity. (This is a proof for R. Zeira above (c).)
[ãó ìã òîåã á (òåæ åäãø)] ùàìå ùáú äøàùåðä åìà áà äùðééä ìà éàëì òã ùéòùø àå òã ùéùàìðå
If he was invited for that first Shabbos but he didn't come, on the second Shabbos, he may not eat until he tithes or asks about their status.
åìà ëáø ùàìå
Question: Didn't he ask already?
àîø øáé éåðä úîï áääåà ãùàì òì ðôùéä áøí äëà áääåà ãùàì çåøéï òìåé
Answer (R. Yona): Then, he asked himself; but now, (on the second Shabbos) others asked for him.
[ãó éæ òîåã á] åøáé éåðä áòé îäå ùéùàìðå
Question (R. Yona): How could he ask him (without causing him to be angry)?
ãøê ò÷ìúåï
Answer: In an indirect fashion.
øáé éåðä ëãòúéä øáé éåðä æáéï çéèé îï ãáø ç÷åìà ðô÷ ìâáéä àîø ìéä ìà ãàðà çùéã ìê àìà áâéï ãæáðéú îéðê çéèé åçîéú àåëìñéí òìê åàîøéú ãéìîà ãàðùéúéä îú÷ðä îú÷ðéï äåééï [ãó ìä òîåã à (òåæ åäãø)] èòï îçæ÷ä òìåé à"ì îä àðà çùã ìé
R. Yona follows his reasoning elsewhere - R. Yona bought wheat from a villager (and forgot to tithe them and remembered on Shabbos) - R. Yona went to the villager and said, "It's not that I suspect you of (intentionally) not tithing, but when I came to you to buy wheat, I saw so many people that I said to myself that perhaps you are so busy, you forgot to tithe". The seller answered that the wheat was tithed. R. Yona didn't rely on him and continued to question him. The seller said, "Why do you suspect me? I already told you that I tithed them!"