What are the two current Pesukim - 11 &12 coming to teach us?
Rashi: Still with reference to a Ba'al-Mum, 1 the Torah is teaching us that a Kodshim Ba'al-Mum cannot be redeemed (to go out to Chulin) unless it obtains a blemish and is assessed by the Kohen.
Temurah, 33b: It teaches us that if a Hekdesh animal became a Ba'al-Mum, it must be stood before the Kohen to assess it, and is then redeemed, and the money used to purchase another Korban.
Rashi: Which the Torah calls 'Teme'ah', because it cannot be sacrificed (and because it also incorporates a dead animal - Sifra. See Torah Temimah, note 57). Temurah, 32b: It cannot be taken literally to mean a Tamei species of animal, since the Torah discusses that in Pasuk 27. See Torah Temimah, note 57.
Why does the Torah refer to a Ba'al-Mum as "Teme'ah" (See Torah Temimah note 57)?
What are the implications of the words "Asher Lo Yakrivu mimenu Korban la'Hashem"?
Temurah, 33a: It implies an animal that will never be eligible as a Korban - to preclude an animal with a temporary blemish - from the Din of Pidyon. 1
See Torah Temimah note 59.
What are the implications of the words "Vehe'emid ha'Beheimah ... "?
Rashi (in Shevu'os, 11b): It implies that the animal must stand 1 on its four legs whist it is being assessed.
Why does the Torah repeat the word "Vehe'emid es ha'Beheimah <i>Lifnei Hashem"?
Menachos, 100b: To teach us that the Din of redeeming Hekdesh that became blemished is confined to animals, but birds, wood, frankincense and K'lei Shareis that became Tamei cannot be redeemed.
