What are the implications of the word "be'Mo'ado"?
What is the definition of "ke'Chol Chukosav"?
Rashi #1: "Chukosav" refers to Mitzvos concerning the body of the animal - "An unblemished male lamb in its first year".
What is the definition of "u'ke'Chol Mishpatav"?
Rashi #1: It is Mitzvos related to the Korban Pesach - such as eating Matzah for seven days and destroying one's Chametz. 1
Rashi #2: Mitzvos connected with the body of the animal are "roasted ... its head, its legs and its innards"; Mitzvos outside the body - Matzah and destroying one's Chametz. 2
Why does the Torah write "Ta'asu oso" twice?
Ramban: Once with regard to the preparation of the Korban Pesach in the afternoon, and once with regard to eating it at nighttime. 1
Ramban: As the Torah wrote in Bo Sh'mos, 12:8.
QUESTIONS ON RASHI
Rashi writes that be'Mo'ado implies 'even on Shabbos' and 'even be'Tum'ah'. But someone who is Tamei brings Pesach Sheini?
Moshav Zekenim #1: If the entire [or majority of] the Tzibur is Tamei, they bring the Pesach be'Tum'ah. 1
Moshav Zekenim #2: Some say that if all [or most of] the Kohanim are Temei'im, they bring the Pesach be'Tum'ah, but if the entire Tzibur is Tamei, they do not. This requires investigation (since the Gemara states in Pesachim 79a that in both cases, and even if most of the K'lei Shareis are Tamei, they bring the Pesach be'Tum'ah ? PF).
Refer to 9::0.1:1 and Torah Temimah, note 3.
Rashi writes that Mitzvos related to the animal, such as eating Matzah for seven days and destroying one's Chametz [apply to Pesach Sheini]. But these issues do not apply to Pesach Sheini?
Ramban and Moshav Zekenim #1: The correct text of Rashi is like his second version (refer to 9:3:3:2).
Moshav Zekenim #2: Some texts of Rashi say 'le'Shiv'ah' (without the word 'Yamim'). Really, it reads 'le'Sovah', that it is eaten when satiated. However, this requires investigation. 1
Perhaps it is difficult because it should have said 'Al ha'Sova' without a 'Hey' at the end. And this did not explain 'destroying Chametz.' (PF)
