What is "ve'Chol Asher Yipol mi'Nivlasam Alav" referring to? What fell on what?
What is the difference between "Tanur" and "Kirayim"
Mishnah in Shabbos 38b: "Tanur" is a squarish oven - narrower on top than at the bottom - with room to place one pot, wheresas a Kirayim is oblong-shaped with room on top for two pots.
Seeing as "Yutatz" (demolished) implies that the oven is attached to the ground, and what is joined to the ground is not subject to Tum'ah, how can the Torah write "Teme'im heim"?
Rambam: The Torah is teaching us here that an oven is subject to Tum'ah despite the fact that it is attached to the ground. 1 .
See Oznayim la'Torah, who discusses Rashi, who interprets the Pasuk with regard to a detached oven ? in spite of the Lashom "Yutatz".
Why does the Torah add the (otherwise superfluous) words "u'Teme'im Yih'yu lachem"?
Rashi: To teach us that, if the owner wants to retain the Tamei vessel, he may do so.
Chulin, 118a: To include in Tum'as Keilim any part of the K'li that one uses together with the K'li ? even the handles. 1
Yerushalmi Shevu'os, 7:1: To forbid trading with any animal that is designated to eat 2 that the Torah forbids.
Yerushalmi Pesachim, 3:2: 'If a flower grows on hops after they have been picked, if Tum'ah touches one of them the other one is Tamei as well ? "Lachem", 'Kol she'Lachem'. 3
The Torah already taught that a Tamei Kli Cheres must be broken. Why does it teach about breaking an oven?
Moshav Zekenim: "Yutatz" teaches that it suffices to break it so it cannot be used. One need not break it into small pieces.
Moshav Zekenim: It teaches that it is subject to Tum'ah even though it is attached [to the ground].
