1)

What are the implications of "Veyashav mi'Chutz le'Ohalo ... "?

1.

Rashi (citing the Sifra) and Targum Yonasan: It implies that he is forbidden to be intimate with his wife 1 for the next seven days. 2

2.

Nega'im,14:2: It implies a. that the Mitaher is forbidden to return to his house,and b. that he is forbidden to be intimate with his wife

1

Rashi (in Pesachim, 67b): "Ohalo", 'Zu Ishto', as the Pasuk says in Devarim 5:27 - "Shuvu lachem le'Ohaleichem" (Moshav Zekenim).

2

Moshav Zekenim: This is because he is like someone who has been excommunicated.

2)

What are the ramifications of "Vetaher"?

1.

Seforno: He is now purified from the obligation of remaining outside the camp.

QUESTIONS ON RASHI

3)

Rashi writes that he is forbidden intimacy. Why did the Mishnah (Megilah 8b) not list this among the differences between a Musgar and a Muchlat?

1.

Tana'im in the Sifra argue about whether or not a Muchlat is forbidden. (Rashi taught only about during seven Yemei Sifro.) The Tana of the Mishnah holds that he is permitted, or taught only matters that all agree to. 1 (PF)

1

I do not know why Moshav Zekenim left this difficult. (PF)

Sefer: Perek: Pasuk:

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page
Sponsorships & Donations • Readers' Feedback • Mailing Lists • Talmud Archives • Ask the Kollel • Dafyomi Weblinks • Dafyomi Calendar • Other Yomi calendars