What does "ve'Chol asher Lahem" incorporate?
Yerushalmi Sanhedrin, 10a #1 (citing R. B'rachyah in the name of R. Chelbo: It incorporates even their names, which disappeared from all their storehouses and documents and rolled down the hole.
Yerushalmi Sanhedrin, 10a #2 (citing R. Eliezer: It incorporates even a needle that someone had borrowed from them rolled down the hole. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 28.
?Vayerdu Heim ? Chayim She?olah?. What are the connotatons of ?She?olah??
?Vayerdu Heim ? Chayim She?olah?. What is the significance of the vfact thsat they wwent down to Gehinom?
R. Bachye (on Pasuk 35): Because it is the way of Hakadosh-Baruch-Hu to punish ?Midah ke?Neged Midah?. Consequently, since Korach ?the father of all egoists, in his attack against Hashem, sought to raise himself to a high position that was not his, Hashem sent him down - ?Midah k?Neged Midah?. 1
What are the implications of "Vat'chas aleihem ha'Aretz"?
Ramban and Seforno: Refer to 16:30:1:5 .
Sanhedrin 108a (according to R. Akiva): It means that they will not arise at Techi?as ha?Meisim. 1
See Torah Temimah citing R. Eliezer, who, citing Shmuel 1, 2:6 ?Hashem Meimis u?Mechayeh Morid She?ol Vaya?al, proves that Korach will arise at Techi'as ha'Meisim. See also note 29 - that this is the majority opinion. Refer also to 16:33:2:4.
What does the Torah mean when it writes "va'Yovdu mi'Toch ha'Kahal"?
Ramban #1: It means that they disappeared before the eyes of the congregation; one moment they were standing there, the next moment they were gone, leaving no sign of where they had just been standing.
Ramban #2 (citing Ibn Ezra): It means that they perished together with their children, who should have replaced them.
Yerushalmi Sanhedrin, 10:4: The Torah is comparing them via a Gezeirah Shavah "Vayovdu" "Hayisi ke'Seh Oveid, Bakeish Avdecha!" - in Tehilim, 119:176 - to a lost article that is sought, 3 so too, will the congregation of Korach be sought - and will merit a portion in the world to come. 4
R. Bachye: And the Torah writes ?mi?Toch ha?Kahal? - because of the peinciple ?All of Yisrael have a portion in Olam ha?Ba?. They will however arise at Techi?as ha?Meisim. See note 2. See also R. Chavel?s footnotes DH ?le?Asid Lavo Chozrim?.
And this teaches us that whoever attacks the Torah attempts to uproot its foundations loses his portion in the Olam ha?Ba. And the Torah writes ?mi?Toch ha?Kahal? - and not ?mi?Toch Yisrael - because of the Pasuk in 19:20 ?Venichresah ha? Nefesh ha?Hi mi?Toch ha?Kahal?.
See Torah Temimah, note 30.
This is difficult to understand seeing as they died without doing Teshuvah and that consequently, neither their death nor their burial atoned for them. Refer to 16:30:151:4.


