What are the implications of "Einenu Shome'a be'Koleinu"?
Sanhedrin, 7ob: It precludes him from the Din of a Ben Sorer u'Moreh where he either performs a Mitzvah against his parents' instructions, 1 or an Aveirah, where he doesn't listen to Hashem's Voice either.
Sanhedrin, 71: It implies that either his father or his mother is deaf, 2 he cannot become a Ben Sorer u'Moreh
What are the connotations of "Zolel ve'Sovei"?
Rashi, Targum Onkelos and Targum Yonasan: It means that he is a glutton - who ate a Tartimar (a large quantity) of meat - and a drunkard - who drank half a Log 1 (three egg-volumes) of wine, 2
Sanhedrin, 70a: "Zolel" (from the Lashon 'Zol' - cheap) implies that the Ben Sorer u'Moreh purchased the met and wine cheap (with the money that he stole from his parents.
Rashi (Ibid.): Which he purchased with money that he stole from them - as the Pasuk indiates in Mishlei, 23:21 & 22 (Seforno).
As the Pasuk writes in Mishlei, 23:20 - thereby precluding any other kind of food or drink, which do not render him a Ben Sorer u'Moreh..
If, as R. Shimon and R. Yehudah, Ben Sorer u'Moreh never happened and never will - See 21:20:152:1**- why does the Torah mention it?
Sanhedrin 71a: The Torah mentions it in order to learn from it (the severity of Kibud Av va'Eim, the consequences of taking a Y'fas To'ar and the importance of Chinuch Banim 1 ).
See Oznayim la'Torah on Pasuk 21, DH 've'Chol Yisrael Yishm'u Veyira'u'.
What are the implications of the words "Beneinu Zeh ... "?
Targum Yonasan: They tell the Chachamim that this son was born to them due to their sins
See Nosei Klei Yonasan.
See Torah Temimah, note 145.
Are the parents obligated to bring a Ben Sorer u'Moreh to be killed?
Sanhedrin 71a and Yerushalmi Sanhedrin 8:4: Both parents have the authority to pardon him, 1 in which case he goes free. 2
Sanhedrin 88a-b: Likewise, a husband can pardon his wife who is a Sotah (by not warning his wife against seclusion). There are two opinions as to whether or not Beis Din can pardon a Zaken Mamrei.
In fact, R. Shimon there states that there never was a Ben Sorer u'Moreh and never will be, because which parent would want their son to be stoned to death for a small theft? According to R. Yehudah there, it never was or will be, since the parents must have the same voice, appearance and stature - which is all but impossible. R. Yonason on the other hand, testified that he sat on the grave of a Ben Sorer u'Moreh. Also refer to Vayikra 13:17:152:3 & 14:37:151:3 and notes.