Why does the Torah insert the Mitzvah of Bikurim here?
Rashi: Still with reference to Pasuk 11, the Torah is teaching us that Bikurim applies even during the Sh'mitah.
Rashbam: To tech us that, when going to the Beis Hamikdash for Aliyah le'Regel, one should make use of the opportunity and take one's Bikurim 1 as well.
From the seven fruits listed in Ki Savo, Devarim 26:2 (Rashbam).
What are the connotations of "Reishis"?
Rashi: The Mitzvah applies to the first fruit that ripens on the tree.
Seforno: It means that Bikurim should be given from the best 1 of the first fruit to appear.
Which fruit does Bikurim comprise?
Rashi: It comprises the seven fruits listed in Eikev, Devarim 8:8 - wheat, barley, grapes, figs, pomegranates, olives and dates. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 132.
What are the implications of "Admascha"?
Bikurim, 1:1-2: It implies that the entire tree is growing from one's own field - to preclude from the Din of Bikurim a. where one plants in one's own field but grafts into a tree in a field belonging to someone else or a communal one, b. vice-versa; c. where one grafts from one tree in one's own field to another, but where a private or public road runs in between the two fields. 1
Bikurim, 1:2: It implies that the fruit must grow from your land - to preclude where it is growing from the tree of a share-cropper (who pays a percentage of the cops) - a tenant who pays a fixed rent, a Sikrikun (person who demands land - on pain of death) or a Gazlan.
Bikurim, 1:1: It precludes from the Din of Bikurim land that belongs to a Nochri. 2
What are the implications of "Tavi Beis Hashem ... "?
Bikurim, 1:5: It implies that the owner is responsible for the Bikurim (to replace them should they get lost or stolen, go bad or become Tamei) until he reaches the Beis-Hamikdash.
Oznayim la'Torah: "Bayis implies that Bikurim may only be brought to a structure of stone, not one of curtains, which explains why it was imperative to replace the current Mishkan with Mishkan Shiloh, which comprised stone walls and a curtain roof. 1 before the obligation to bring Bikurim fell due at the termination of the fourteen years of Yerushah and Yeshivah. 2
What does the Mitzvah of Bikurim entail?
Rashi: When one sees a fig (for example) that has ripened, one ties a red thread around it and declares it Bikurim, which one then takes to Yerushalayim and gives to a Kohen. 1
See the beginning of Ki Savo for more details.
From where do we know to give Bikurim to a Kohen?
Rashi (in Naso): From the Pasuk in Naso Bamidbar, 5:9: "Asher Yakrivu la'Kohen lo Yih'yeh".
What are the connotations of the La'av "Lo Sevashel G'di ba'Chaleiv Imo"?
Rashi, Ramban (in Re'ei, Devarim 14:21) and R. Bachye (citing Chulin 115b): The Torah presents it three times, once to prohibit eating (even in an unusual manner ? R. Bachye) 1 2 meat cooked in its mother's milk, 3 once to forbid deriving benefit from it and once to prohibit cooking them together. 4
Rashbam (in Ki Seitzei, Devarim 22:6)): Refer to Devarim, 22:6:7:4. 5
Seforno: It implies that one should do acts such as these in order to obtain an abundance of fruit, but should rather give Bikurim. 6
Targum Onkelos: It is a prohibition against eating meat and milk together.
Targum Yonasan: It is a prohibition against cooking and eating meat mixed with milk. 7
Moshav Zekenim: It implies that the prohibition is confined to where they were cooked together, but not if they were soaked together - even the entire day. 8
Hadar Zekenim #1: It means that one should not delay [sacrificing one's first born animals] for them to nurse and mature - but offer them immediately.
Hadar Zekenim #2 (citing Seifer ha'Gan): It is callous to cook meat with the milk from which it grew and lived. 9
Hadar Zekenim #2: It means that one should not leave Bikurim to nurture on the tree (which is their 'mother'), but should rather bring them immediately.
Hadar Zekenim #3: If you bring Bikurim, the grain will not burn when it is soft 10 and in Cheilev ha'Aretz (its mother); if not they will burn then. Do not bring Bikurim when they are soft; wait for them to ripen.
Da'as Zekenim (34:26): It hints at the Isur [mi'de'Rabanan] of marrying a woman who is nursing her baby from her previous husband, until twenty-four months. 11
See R. Bache and note 49. See also Torah Temimah, note 138.
R. Bachye: In fact, Basar be'Chalav and K'lai ha'Kerem are the only two Isurim which are subject to Malkos even even one eats them 'she'Lo ke'Derech Hana'asan.
Refer to 23:19:6:2. The reason that the Torah presents the Isur Achilah and Hana'ah in a Lashon of Bishul is because min ha'Torah, it is only if they are cooked together that they are subject to the Isur Achilah snd Hana'ah. See also Ba'al ha'Turim in Re'ei.
Rashbam (Ibid.): In similar fashion, the Torah forbids Oso ve'es B'no (Vayikra 22:28) and Shilu'ach ha'Ken (Devarim 22:6-7) - because it is cruel and gluttonous to take a mother with her children and Shecht, cook and eat them together.
Seforno: As the Pasuk writes in Yechezkel, 44:30.
Targum Yonasan: Because if one does, it will arouse Hashem's anger, and He will be Mevashel (ripen) the grain mixed together with the stubble - See Na'ar Yonasan. Refer also to Devarim 14:21:1:1.
See Moshav Zekenim.
In similar vein, the Torah forbids taking a mother bird together with its young, and to Shecht a mother and her child on the same day.
Hadar Zekenim: 'G'di' is like 'mi'Meged'; or, it is anything soft.
Rosh citing R. Sa'adya Gaon: The Gematriya of Tevashel is seven hundred and thirty (the number of days in two years; the 'Beis' hints at) excluding the day of death [of the father] and the day he is Mekadesh her. Moshav Zekenim in Devarim 14:21: This teaches us that she must wait two full solar years, and not merely twenty-four lunar months.
How do we know to read the word "ba'Chaleiv Imo", and not "be'Cheilev Imo"?
Sanhedrin, 4b: Because "Lo Sevashel G'di ... " implies in the way that one normally cooks, and one does not normally cook meat in fat.
What is the significance of the fact that the Torah juxtaposes "Lo Sevashel G'di ba'Chaleiv Imo" to "Tavi Beis Hashem Elokecha"?
Mechilta: It teaches us that the Isur of Basar be'Chalav extends to Kodshim. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 139.
Why does the Torah forbid cooking and eating meat and milk together?
Hadar Zekenim #2 (citing Seifer ha'Gan): Because it is callous to cook meat with the milk from which it grew and lived. 1
In similar vein, the Torah forbids taking a mother bird together with its young, and to Shecht a mother and her child on the same day.
Why does the Torah forbid cooking and eating meat and milk together?
R. Bachye: Because milk is formed from the blood of an animal.The property of blood remains latent in the milk however, and is activated when cooked with the flesh from which it initially came, to create a Timtum ha'Leiv (a dullness or stupidity of the heart) and a cruel trait in the person who imbibes it. 1
Hadar Zekenim #2 (citing Seifer ha'Gan): Because it is callous to cook meat with the milk from which it grew and lived. 2
Why does the Torah write specifically "G'di"?
Rashi #1: Because 'G'di' is the term that incorporates all young, tender animals. 1
Rashi #2 (in Re'ei Devarim, 14:21): It writes "G'di" three times, to preclude Chayos, birds and fish 2 from the prohibition.
Ibn Ezra: Because it was common to cook a kid-goat in its mother's milk - since its meat is not moist. 3
Chulin, 113b: "On the one hand, "G'di" incorporates Cheilev, a Neveilah and an embryo in the prohibition of Basar be'Chechalav, whilst on the other, it precludes a placenta and a non-Kasher animal from the prohibiton. 4
Rashi: Which we learn from the fact that the Torah writes in Vayeishev Bereishis, 27:9, in connection with Yehudah and Tamar "Vayishlach Yehudah es G'di ha'Izim", implying that "G'di" S'tam incorporates any animal.
See Torah Temimah, citing Chulin, 113b, which substitutes Beheimah Teme'ah for fish, and note 140. See also answer #4.
See Torah Temimah, note 141.
See Torah Temimah, note 144, as to why Cheilev and Neveilah are not Halachah.
What are trhe implications of ba'Chaleiv Imo"
Chulin, 113b: It precludes cooking the milk of a male animal, of an animal that has been Shechted and of a non-Kasher animal from the prohibition of Basar be'Chalav. 1
Chulin, 114: It includes cooking the meat of an animal in the milk of a different 2 cow or of a sheep and the a kid-goat in its own mother's milk.
Why does the Torah juxtapose "Lo Sevashel G'di ... " to "Tavi Beis Hashem Elokecha"?
Mechilta: To include Kodshim in the prohibition of Basar be'Chalav. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 139.
Why does the Torah insert meat and milk here, in connection with the Yamim-Tovim?
R. Bachye #1: To warn Yisrael that, (with no known reason) and when they go to Yerushalayim three times a year, their minds should be clear to reflect on the ways of the Torah (which they can learn from the Kohanim performing the Avodah) and not blocked by eating meat cooked in milk.
R. Bachye #2 (citing the Rambam in Moreh ha'Nevuchim): Because it was the way of the Nochri priests to eat meat cooked in milk on their festivals, and the Torah tends to do the opposite of anything that the idolaterd do in order to uproot idolatry from the world. 1
R. Bachye #3 (according to Kabalah): Because meat and milk on earth represent Midas ha'Din and Midas ha'Rachamim respectively in the upper worlds 2
Rashbam: Because one tends to eat a lot of meat on Yom-Tov.
After presenting both explanations, R. Bachye concludes that when all's said and done, Basar be'Chalav is a Chok ? like Parah Adumah and Sa'ir ha'Mishtale'ach, and the reasons suffice to push away the questioner but no more. And at the time of Techi'as ha'Meisim, Hakadosh-Baruch-Hu will reveal to us the reasons for all the Chukim. See R. Bachye who connects the prohibition of rvealing the reason for the prohibition with the prohibition itself, and when the prohibition will be negated, the reaon will be reveled.
Indeed, 'Chukim' are so-called precisely because they are engraved in the upper worlds. See R. Bachye.
What is the connection between Bikurim and meat and milk?
R. Bachye #1: The comparison teaches us that, like Basar be'Chalav, Bikurim (which becameTamei) are Asur be'Hana'ah.
R. Bachye #2: The comparison teaches us that one must bring Bikurim from what is ripe ('Mevushal'), and not before.
Seforno: It teaches us that, if one wants to enjoy a successful fruit harvest, the way to do it is by observing the Mitzvah of Bikurim (and Terumah), as the Pasuk writes in Yechezkel, 44:30, and not by indulging in various kinds of sorcery, such as cooking kid-goats in their mothers' milk.
Hadar Zekenim: Refer to 23:19:5:5,7 & 8.
Moshav Zekenim (34:26): To teach us that, just as Hashem commanded us to separate Bikurim, and forbade new grain until we bring the Omer and separate [its Kometz], so too, are we obligated to separate milk from meat, because once they are together, they are forbidden.
Why does the Torah repeat this La'av three times - once here, once in Ki Sisa 34:26 and once in Re'ei, Devarim 14:21?
Rashi #1 and Ramban Refer to 23:19:5:1.
Rashi #2 (in Re'ei, Devarim, 14:21): To preclude Chayos, birds and fish from the Isur.
Seeing as the other two references to Basar be'Chalav are referring to eating and Isur Hana'ah, why does the Torh write "Lo Sevashel G'di ? "?
QUESTIONS ON RASHI
Rashi writes that Basar be'Chalav is written three times; one time forbids eating meat cooked in milk. We should know this already from "Lo Sochal Kol To'evah"?
Riva (citing R. Elyakim): "Lo Sochal Kol To'evah" is La'av she'bi'Chelalos (which incorporates many issues), which is not subject to Malkos,; the Torah therefore inserts the current Pasuk is obligate Malkos.