What are the implications of the phrase "ve'Im Mach hu me'Erkecha"?
Rashi: It implies that the Ma'arich cannot afford to pay the Erech of the Ne'erach.
"Ve'he'emido lifnei ha'Kohen"? Who stands up whom?
Rashi: The Ma'arich stands the Ne'erach in front of the Kohen.
Why does the Torah insert "ha'Kohen" ten times in the current Parshah (See Torah Temimah, note 27)?
Sanhedrin, 15a: To teach us that, although the assessment of Hekdesh and of Erchin Metalt'lin requires only three Dayanim, Adam, like Karka, requires ten - nine Yisre'elim and one Kohen. 1
Sanhedrin, Ibid.: One Kohen is intrinsic, the other time - following the principle 'Ein Miy'ut achar Miy'ut Ela Lerabos - include nine Yisre'elim.
What are the implications of "Vehe'emido Lifnei ha?Kohen"?
How does the Kohen assess him?
What are the implications of the phrase "Al-Pi asher Tasig Yad ha'Noder"?
Erchin, 17b: "Asher Tasig Yad" implies that if he was poor at the time that he was assessed and became afterwards he pays the higher Erech, and "al-Pi asher Tasig Yad" implies that the same applies in the reverse case. 1
Erchin, 17a: "Yad ha'Noder" implies that Beis-Din's assessment follows the status of the Ma'arich, and not of the Ne'arach. 2
Why does the Torah add the (otherwise superfluous) words "Ya'arichenu ha'Kohen"?