What are the implications of "Veheivi osam el ha'Kohen"?
Sifra: "Osam" implies that the sinner must bring the birds themselves and that they cannot be redeemed, and "el ha'Kohen", that he is liable for anything that happens to the birds until he hands them over to the Kohen.
Having already written in Pasuk 9, "ve'es ha'Sheini Ya'aseh Olah", why does the Torah write here "Vehikriv es asher la'Chatas Rishonah"?
Zevachim, 90a: This is a Binyan Av that Chata'os always precede Olos ? even if it is a Chatas ha'Of and an Olas Beheimah. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 60.
Why does the Chatas generally precede the Olah?
Rashi: It can be compared to an advocate who appears before the king to intercede on behalf of his client, who presents the king with a gift before taking leave of him. Here too, the Chatas is the advocate, and the Olah, the gift.
Moshav Zekenim: In order to show that Ba'alei Teshuvah are dear to Hashem.
Why does the Torah write "u'Malak es Rosho" ? and not simply "u'Malko"?
Chulin, 27b: To extrapolate the Shechitah of an animal from the Din of "Mul Orpo", - only from the neck. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 61.
What are the implications of "ve'Lo Yavdil"?
Targum Yonasan: It means that he should not sever the head from the body completely.
Sifra: It teaches us that if one did divide it, it is Pasul. 3
What is the definition of of "Mul Oref"?
Rashi: "Oref" is the back of the head that begins to slope towards the neck; "Mul Oref", the continuation of the slope incorporating the entire (back of) the neck.
